Submit

Contextualization of the Augmented Reality Quality Model through Social Media Analytics

Open AccessArticle

Contextualization of the Augmented Reality Quality Model through Social Media Analytics

Volume 5, Issue 4, Page No 184–191, 2020

Author’s Name: Jim Scheibmeir* 1Email, Yashwant Malaiya 2
1 Colorado State University, Systems Engineering, 80523, United States
2 Colorado State University, Computer Science, 80523, United States
*whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jimscheibmeir@gmail.com

Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 5(4), 184–191 (2020); crossref symbol DOI: 10.25046/aj050422

Keywords: Augmented Reality, Software Quality, Social Media Analytics, Quality Model

Received: 15 June 2020, Accepted: 12 July 2020, Published Online: 22 July 2020
(This article belongs to the SP9 (Special Issue on Multidisciplinary Innovation in Engineering Science & Technology 2020) & Section Operations Research & Management Science (ORM))
Download Now!
659 Downloads
Export Citations

Abstract

Augmented Reality applications are gaining popularity while maintaining novelty. Many industries are utilizing the user interface type, and use cases are becoming repeat patterns of problem solutions. Despite this rising popularity, quality has not matured nor has the technology become mainstream. Novelty must be approached as risk, and risk must be evaluated for and tested to assure adequate levels of quality. Quality itself can also be vague and have contextual definition. For these reasons, a quality model for augmented reality was created. This work analyzes over two hundred thousand tweets, collected during 2019 and 2020, relating to augmented reality technology, and contextualizes various data points to the established AR Quality Model. The education industry had the highest mentions among the tweets within the scope of this research while the tweets labeled to the transportation industry had the highest sentiment. Furthermore, the tweets were shown to illustrate the needs of testing against the characteristics within the quality model; presence, perspective, interaction, portability and persistence.

References (31)

  1. J. Scheibmeir and Y. K. Malaiya, “Quality Model for Testing Augmented Reality Applications,” 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York City, NY, USA, 0219-0226, 2019. doi: 10.1109/UEMCON47517.2019.8992974.
  2. I. Rabbi, S. Ullah, A survey on augmented reality challenges and tracking, Acta Graphica: J. Print. Sci. Graphic Commun, 24(1-2), 2013, pp. 29-46, 2013.
  3. X. Wang, A. Kotranza, J. Quarles, B. Lok, B.D. Allen, A pipeline for rapidly incorporating real objects into a mixed environment, in The 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Washington, DC, USA, October 2005, 170-173, 2005.
  4. D. Cearly, et al. “Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2020: Multiexperience.” Gartner, 10 Mar. 2020. www.gartner.com/doc/3981950.
  5. S.P. Yun, H.J. Yap, R. Singh, S.W. Chang, K.L.R. Cheong, Augmented reality assisted factory layout planning and analysis for a flexible manufacturing cell, in International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Mathematics, 106-111, 2014.
  6. S. J. Henderson, S. Feiner, Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret, in 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Orlando, FL, USA, 135-144, 2009.
  7. G. Westerfield, A. Mitrovic, M. Billinghurst, Intelligent augmented reality training for motherboard assembly, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 25(1), 157-172, 2015.
  8. “ISO/IEC 25010.” ISO 25000. Accessed May 22, 2020. https://iso25000.com/index.php/en/iso-25000-standards/iso-25010.
  9. A. Dünser and M Billinghurst “Evaluating augmented reality systems,” In: Furht B. (eds) Handbook of Augmented Reality. Springer, New York, NY, 289-307, 2011.
  10. A. Sutcliffe and K. Kaur, “Evaluating the usability of virtual reality user interfaces,” Behaviour and Information Technology, vol. 19, 2001.
  11. J. Scheibmeir and Y. Malaiya, “An API Development Model for Digital Twins,” 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019, pp. 518-519, 2019. doi: 10.1109/QRS-C.2019.00103.
  12. J. Scheibmeir, T. Murphy, and J. Herschmann. “Promote Continuous Quality for APIs to Support Digital Business.” Gartner, February 21, 2019. https://www.gartner.com/doc/3902567.
  13. A. Cirillo, RStudio for R Statistical Computing Cookbook. Birmingham (Gran Bretania): Packt Publishing, 2016.
  14. “How to Tweet.” Twitter. Accessed May 23, 2020. https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/how-to-tweet.
  15. J. Wong, A. Leow, Gartner Survey Analysis: Insights to Kick-Start an Enterprise Multiexperience Development Strategy, 12 February 2019. https://www.gartner.com/document/3901479
  16. R.S. Perdana, A. Pinandito, ” Combining Likes-Retweet Analysis and Naive Bayes Classifier within Twitter for Sentiment Analysis”, Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 10(1-8), 41-46, 2018.
  17. Apple’s ARKit: Cheat sheet, Cory Bohon, TechRepublic, June 7, 2019. Accessed September 28, 2019. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/apples-arkit-everything-the-pros-need-to-know/
  18. International Labor Organization. “Industries and Sectors.” Industries and sectors, n.d. https://www.ilo.org/global/industries-and-sectors/lang–en/index.htm.
  19. M. Ghiassi, , J. Skinner, D. Zimbra, “Twitter brand sentiment analysis: a hybrid system using n-gram analysis and dynamic artificial neural network” Expert Systems with Applications, 40(16), 6266-6282, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.057
  20. H. Purohit, A. Hampton, V.L. Shalin, A.P. Sheth, J. Flach, S. Bhatt. What kind of #conversation is Twitter Mining #psycholinguistic cues for emergency coordination Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (6), 2438-2447, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.007
  21. C. Hung, “Word of Mouth Quality Classification Based on Contextual Sentiment Lexicons.” Information Processing & Management 53(4), 51–63, 2013.
  22. T. Rinker, “Sentimentr.” README, n.d. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sentimentr/readme/README.html
  23. Application Research Team. “Proven Design Principles to Deliver a High-Value Employee User Experience.” Gartner, May 12, 2020. https://www.gartner.com/doc/3985028.
  24. J. Scheibmeir, J. Herschmann, T. Murphy, “Quality Is the Key to Avoiding ‘Digital Distortion’ With Your Augmented Reality Strategy.” Gartner, April 16, 2020. https://www.gartner.com/doc/3983581.
  25. M. Jansen, “Escape Reality with the Best Augmented Reality Apps for Android and IOS.” Digital Trends. Digital Trends, June 9, 2019. https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/best-augmented-reality-apps/.
  26. Use Vuforia for computer vision and augmented reality apps, 2019, https://www.ptc.com/en/products/augmented-reality/vuforia
  27. Downloads, 2019.
    https://developers.facebook.com/docs/arstudio/downloads/
  28. Get ready for the latest advances in augmented reality, 2019. https://developer.apple.com/augmented-reality/
  29. ARCore overview, February 28, 2019. https://developers.google.com/ar/discover/
  30. Wikitude Augmented Reality SDK, 2019, https://www.wikitude.com/products/wikitude-sdk/
  31. AR SDK, 2019, Maxst. “Setup Guide.” 3.4.x ᅵ MAXST Developer Site, n.d. https://developer.maxst.com/MD/doc/unity/setup.

Cited By

Citations by Dimensions

Citations by PlumX

Google Scholar

(Click to view)

Crossref Citations

Mertics

No. of Downloads Per Month
No. of Downloads Per Country

Related Articles

  1. Woratida Sawangnamwong, Siam Charoenseang, "Assistive System for Collaborative Assembly Task using Augmented Reality", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 110–118, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090412
  2. Gil Hyun Kang, Hwi Jin Kwon, In Soo Chung, Chul Su Kim, "Development and Usability Evaluation of Mobile Augmented Reality Contents for Railway Vehicle Maintenance Training: Air Compressor Case", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 91–103, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090109
  3. Lucksawan Yutthanakorn, Siam Charoenseang, "Augmented Reality Based Visual Programming of Robot Training for Educational Demonstration Site", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 8–16, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080502
  4. Misael Lazo Amado, Leoncio Cueva Ruiz, Laberiano Andrade-Arenas, "Prototype of an Augmented Reality Application for Cognitive Improvement in Children with Autism Using the DesingScrum Methodology", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 587–596, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060163
  5. Rendani Wilson Maladzhi, Grace Mukondeleli Kanakana-Katumba, "Evolution of Teaching Approaches for Science, Engineering and Technology within an Online Environment: A Review", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1207–1216, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506144
  6. Arooba Shahoor, Rida Shaukat, Sumaira Sultan Minhas, Hina Awan, Kashif Saghar, "SharpniZer: A C# Static Code Analysis Tool for Mission Critical Systems", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 561–570, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050668
  7. Jim Scheibmeir, Yashwant Malaiya, "Multi-Model Security and Social Media Analytics of the Digital Twin", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 323–330, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050639
  8. Zuhri Syarifudin, Suharjito, "Mobile Based for Basic English Learning Assessment with Augmented Reality", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 774–780, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050297
  9. Emmanuel Peters, George Kwamina Aggrey, "An ISO 25010 Based Quality Model for ERP Systems", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 578–583, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050272
  10. Diego Iquira-Becerra, Michael Flores-Conislla, Juan Deyby Carlos-Chullo, Briseida Sotelo-Castro, Claudia Payalich-Quispe, Carlo Corrales-Delgado, "A Critical Analysis of Usability and Learning Methods on an Augmented Reality Application for Zoology Education", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 384–392, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050250
  11. Lorenzo Damiani, Roberto Revetria, Emanuele Morra, "Safety in Industry 4.0: The Multi-Purpose Applications of Augmented Reality in Digital Factories", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 248–253, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050232
  12. Constantina Costopoulou, Maria Ntaliani, Filotheos Ntalianis, "An Analysis of Social Media Usage in Winery Businesses", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 380–387, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040446
  13. Takahiro Ishizu, Makoto Sakamoto, Masamichi Hori, Takahiro Shinoda, Takaaki Toyota, Amane Takei, Takao Ito, "Hidden Surface Removal for Interaction between Hand and Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 359–365, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040444
  14. Keisuke Fukagawa, Yuima Kanamori, Akinori Minaduki, "A Development of Agility Mode in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Learning Support System Visualized by Augmented Reality", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 136–139, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030616
  15. Miho Nishizaki, "Visualizing Affordances of Everyday Objects Using Mobile Augmented Reality to Promote Safer and More Flexible Home Environments for Infants", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 74–82, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030607
  16. Khaled Slhoub, Marco Carvalho, "Towards Process Standardization for Requirements Analysis of Agent-Based Systems", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 80–91, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030311
  17. Carmen Ramos, Tania Patiño, "Program with Ixquic", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 918–921, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj0203115
  18. Shu Wang, Vassilis Charissis, David K. Harisson, "Augmented Reality Prototype HUD for Passenger Infotainment in a Vehicular Environment", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 634–641, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020381
  19. Isabel Cristina Siqueira da Silva, Gerson Klein, Denise Munchen Brandão, "Segmented and Detailed Visualization of Anatomical Structures based on Augmented Reality for Health Education and Knowledge Discovery", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 469–478, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020360
Submit to ASTESJ
Review for ASTESJ
Propose a Special Issue
Share

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Special Issues

Propose a Special Issue

Special Issue on Emerging Multidisciplinary Directions in Engineering, Computing, and Applied Sciences
Guest Editors: Prof. Wang Xiu Ying
Deadline: 31 December 2026

Special Issue on Digital Frontiers of Entrepreneurship: Integrating AI, Gender Equity, and Sustainable Futures
Guest Editors: Dr. Muhammad Nawaz Tunio, Dr. Aamir Rashid, Dr. Imamuddin Khoso
Deadline: 30 May 2026

Special Issue on Sustainable Technologies for a Resilient Future
Guest Editors: Dr. Debasis Mitra, Dr. Sourav Chattaraj, Dr. Addisu Assefa
Deadline: 30 April 2026

Special Issue on Multidisciplinary Frontiers in Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences
Guest Editors: Prof. Wang Xiu Ying
Deadline: 30 April 2026