1. Introduction

One of the most important inquires in business has been why some organizations succeed while others fizzle. Organizational performance is one of the most articulated concerns for all organizations, either profit or not-for-profit. It has been immensely important for stakeholders, especially for managers, to identify the components that influence an organization’s performance so that they can initiate appropriate actions. However, describing, conceptualizing, and measuring organizational performance has never been an easy undertaking [1]. Various researchers have made an attempt to define and assess organizational performance, yet it remains an issue of debate among analysts [2]. Basically, organizational performance refers to the outcomes of daily administrative processes [3] that the organization intends to accomplish in the long-term [4]. The primary concern of the study of organizational performance is the suitability of various approaches to deal with the idea usage and its measurement [5].

Organizational performance is a multifaceted concept, and the use of a financial measures-based performance system alone is not sufficient to measure performance of organizations operating in highly competitive, innovative, and advanced technological environments [6]. As such, the contemporary business environment demands a multidimensional performance measurement system that can provide more information to stakeholders, more specifically managers. Out of several dimensions of the performance measurement system, the telecommunication industry’s two inherent components are technology and innovation due to the fact that adoption of technological advancements through innovative actions distinguishes products/services or companies in the competitive market.

Although the determinants of technological and innovation performance are still unclear, accomplishing and sustaining superior organizational performance, especially in the cellular telecommunications setting has become a top priority today. The study therefore tries to find the measures to assess and quantify the technological and innovation performance of the Nepalese cellular telecommunications industry. Alongside that, the study’s objective is to examine the intensity of technological and innovation performance measures in the Nepalese scenario and initiate some theoretical and practical discussions for better organizational performance.

This study is extremely significant in the scenario of Nepalese telecommunications industry as the cellular telecommunications has been growing by leaps and bounds and gradually covering the broad spectrum of Nepali populace. As per [7], the number of Global System for Mobile (GSM) network subscribers has surpassed 3.5 million as of June 2020. The industry’s main focus as it can be observed is on mobile phones and their primary functions, such as calling and hearing. Telecommunication companies are under persistent pressure to deliver creative items more rapidly, at lower cost, and with enhanced quality [8]. This shows that cellular telecommunications companies have a special relationship with the customer, and necessitates the assessment of organizational performance in order to strength that relationship by incorporating new features at lower cost with better services in the future.

2. Literature Review

The literature contends that technological and innovative performance measures are endogenous and are impacted by more profound organizational growth determinants. In today’s knowledge-based economy, corporate growth is driven primarily by creative capacity, invigorated by the pertinent information and technological externalities, instead of gathering capital [8]. So, performance measures concerning technology and innovation stand at the point of convergence of organizational performance measurement system.

2.1.  Technological performance measures

The world of technology is changing at a rapid pace, and telecommunications technology is not an exception. Over time, technological changes have a significant impact on the creation of marketing opportunities [9]. The preferences of customers change rapidly and pose numerous difficulties for any business [10]. Technological advances, especially in information and communication technology (ICT), make product/service innovation conceivable [11]. New technologies bring new challenges to business players and seek opportunities to offer customers innovative products/services to pursue long-term relationships [12] and distinguish them from other competitors [13]. Previous studies like [14]-[16], have analyzed the crucial role of technology in the performance and competitiveness of organizations. This study thus examined and evaluated some technological performance measures among the various customers.

Network and service quality has a significant role in organizational performance for telecom service providers [17]. In [18], [19], the authors acknowledged that network quality is one of the crucial factors that determine the organization’s performance in evaluating its service quality.

Signal strength and coverage have always been essential criteria for selecting telecom services. Multiple studies demonstrate that signal strength and range positively affect consumers’ satisfaction and the organization’s image [20], leading to overall organizational performance.

Voice quality in telecommunications networks has been a fundamental part of service qualification. Because of the inherent characteristics of a converged voice and voice-over internet protocol (VoIP), administrators face specific problems such as echo, jitter, delay, side-tone, background noise, etc. Quick and efficient mitigation of VoIP issues to maximize call quality leads to better service provider performance [21].

Calls drop is another key performance indicator to assess the performance of operators’ networks. It is expected to have a direct impact on customer satisfaction and retention [22].

Electronic customer relationship management (e-CRM) allows users to frequently communicate with one another and maintain their databases as clearly as possible while improving customer relationships [23]. Implementation and uses of e-CRM enhance organizational effectiveness and significantly connect with the overall performance [24].

2.2.  Innovation Performance Measures

New methods of products, processes, and other components are being applied to organizations by innovation [25]. It transforms into a product/service as it is produced and bought by the customer and provides the vendors with financial benefits. Innovation performance measures introduce new strategic tactics, working environment and guidelines, decision-making techniques, and better external relations approaches [26]. Studies like [27], [28], [29], have been conducted to examine the crucial role of innovation on a firm’s performance and competitiveness. Despite several dimensions of the innovation performance measures, the study secured just five general business criteria and assessed them from the customers’ perspective.

Product/service innovation satisfies customers by turning the invention or idea into a product/service and enhancing company value at acceptable risk [30]. Innovation analyzes the needs of the customers and provides the products/services accordingly. Therefore, product/service innovation helps escalate customer benefits [29] tantamount to better organizational performance.

Process innovation refers to doing business in a new and innovative way [31]. Conversion of new technology into processes, especially in ICT based companies, has a significant impact on the performance of the firm. Process innovation therefore represents a type of service innovation that provides an immense advantage in creating new streams of value for better customer experiences, thereby enhancing a firm’s competitiveness and overall performance of a company [32].

Customization is the process of making and changing something to the buyer’s or user’s needs. The telecommunication sector’s service competitiveness, including variations of services and facilities and the degree of customization, influences technological and innovative performance. Additionally, customization capability encourages service systems to suit a specific customer within a particular use-circumstance and to make a unique value for that customer [33].

Competitive innovation is a strategy that organizations use to make a competitive advantage by developing products that nobody else can, showing improvements over every other person, or presenting prevalent, less expensive, and quicker services [34]. It is a type of social design that focuses on creating and elaborating the best and practical thoughts originating from the best innovators for superior organizational performance.

Marketing innovation is implementing a new advertising technique, including significant changes in product design, placement, packaging, distribution, communication, promotion, and pricing strategy [35]. According to [36], improvisation, modification, augmentation, or transformation of existing trade channels using technology can reduce transaction costs that lead to better organizational performance. [37] also argued that companies developing innovative practices were more able to position themselves on the market against their competitors and achieve emphatic retention of customers.

Figure 1:  Conceptual framework of the study

2.3 Technological and Innovation Performance

Various metrics can be used to assess a firm’s performance [38]. Technological and innovation initiatives are considered to be primary indicators of the cellular telecommunication industry. They allow the firm to improve capability to meet the demands of its evolving domestic and international market [39], thus giving the firm a lucrative outcome.

The overall technological aspect is multidimensional and can be decomposed appropriately from different perspectives [40]. Studies showed that technological advancement is a primary determinant of superior long-term success [41] and leads to better performance than rivals [42].

The overall innovation aspect allows better delivery of the services offered and a more significant impact of any campaign and promotes organizational changes standardizing certain activities [43]. In [44], the authors evidenced that in firms, where there is a willingness to innovate its products/services, there is a significant and positive impact on overall organizational performance.

3. Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses

Organizational performance shows the development and progress of an organization [45]. The analysis of organizational success is one of the most investigated variables. It is a criterion for management and tends to depend on the fitness between corporate systems and situational factors. Therefore, the study is driven by the contingency theory, which provides a practical perspective for examining and measuring different contingent variables.

Within the framework of prior literature and conceptual sketching, the study has the following two hypotheses:

H1:   Technological performance positively and significantly   affects technological and innovation performance.

H2: Innovation performance positively and significantly            affects technological and innovation performance.

4. Methodology

The quantitative research strategy was employed to extract information for the study, and the required information was acquired through a structured questionnaire survey from the targeted respondents. The study used a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 23 and analysis of moment structures (AMOS) version 21 software to dissect and decipher the information. The study’s targeted populace comprised all the Global System for Mobile (GSM) customers of Nepal Telecom and Ncell. According to [7], the sample companies’ customers possess more than 93 % of the Nepalese cellular telecommunications market share. The study employed a judgmental sampling technique because there was no proof of active and the dead Subscriber Identification Module (SIM) card issued with the sample organizations. Targeted respondents of the study were postgraduate understudies, service holders, business persons, and freelancers. A sampling plan was used as proposed by [46], [47] and ensured at least 385 respondents’ responses. Therefore, the study employed 391 respondents’ perceptions as sample.

The designed questionnaire for the survey comprised 19 questions and structured them into three segments. In the first segment, seven items were requested, relating to demographic and general information. In the second segment, 10 items mentioned about technological and innovation performance measures in various dimensions. In the last segment, two items inquired about the overall technological and innovation performance. The last two segments centered on the study variables with a series of close-ended questions to get the appropriate information. With a 6-point Likert-type scale of 1 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree, all the survey queries of the study variables were estimated. The 6-point scale was picked because it excludes the undecided middle rating.

The researchers distributed the questionnaires through an online and a field survey. Based on the data provided by different colleges/universities, an online survey conducted among university graduates from the recent five years and who are working in Nepal’s various parts. A total of 500 respondents approached during the 30-days of January/February 2020. Out of this, 143 responses were received from the online survey and recorded in SPSS for further analysis. On the other hand, the researchers themselves disseminated 500 questionnaires among Tribhuvan, Kathmandu, Pokhara, and Purbanchal Universities’ graduate students and their faculties to conduct the field survey. Out of them, 276 responses were collected during the period of 30 days in January/February 2020. From the collected responses through the field survey, 28 were rejected due to incomplete information. The remaining 391 responses were considered valid and were used in this study.

5. Reliability and Validity of the Survey Instrument

The study assessed the reliability and validity to confirm the constructs’ suitability before evaluating the hypothesized model. The survey instrument’s overall reliability statistics showed an excellent Cronbach’s alpha (α = 0.819) and the average inter-item correlation coefficient (r = 0.312) from the 10 test items. Despite having excellent values of the statistics, construct-wise Cronbach’s alpha was also analyzed. The value of Cronbach’s alpha of the technological performance construct having five test items (VAR_8, 9, 10, 11, and 12) was 0.775. The analysis found that the VAR_12 ‘the company alters and provides me all information through SMS’ required to delete because of the higher value of alpha 0.807 if the item deleted. The variable VAR_12 also had a low correlation (0.317) to total correlation, while the rest were in the area of 0.576 to 0.680. Therefore, VAR_12 was also not relevant in the study and deleted from the analysis. None of the items were found to delete at the innovation performance construct. Thus, reliability statistics promoted nine variables within two constructs for further study. Table 1 presented the analytical result for the reliability statistics of each construct.

Table 1: Reliability Statistics

The construct-wise statistics showed that both constructs had good alpha values, i.e., 0.7 or higher, as suggested by [48]. The innovation performance construct had good average inter-item correlation (r = 0.394) whereas the technological performance construct had (r = 0.512) slightly higher than the recommended ideal range of 0.15 to 0.50 by [49]. A higher value of the average inter-item correlation indicated that the measuring variables might be capturing a small bandwidth and tended to be very similar to each other.

The study had an adequate sample size concerning the validity issue since the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.816 from nine test items was more significant than the threshold value of 0.5 as recommended by [50]. The significant value of Bartlett’s test of sphericity (1035.011, df = 36, p = 0.000) indicated that the variables had some correlations to each other. The constructs’ validity was assessed by using convergent and discriminant validity. Table 2 presented the validity statistics of the technological and innovation performance model.

Table 2: Validity Statistics

Validity statistics showed that both constructs had a good value of composite reliability, i.e., greater than 0.7, as suggested by [51]. They stated that if the average variance extracted is less than 0.5, but composite reliability is higher than 0.70, the latent measures’ convergent validity is adequate. In addition, in [52], the authors proclaimed that AVE values > 0.4 are considered acceptable convergent validity measures. In the case of discriminant validity, there was no multicollinearity problem since inter latent variables correlation (r = 0.47) was less than the threshold value of 0.7, as recommended by [53]. Similarly, as per [51] criterion, AVEs of the constructs were greater than MSV/ASV. The square root of the constructs’ AVEs (presented in bold in Table 2) was higher than the correlation between the constructs for satisfactory discriminant validity. Therefore, the constructs were distinct and measuring the theoretically-driven facts. Besides, absolute values of skewness (- 0.515 to – 0.152) and kurtosis (- 0.949 to – 0.142) of the observed variables proved normality of the data as they were reported within the recommended ± 2 range [54]. The absolute value of standardized residual covariance of the variables (- 1.862 to + 1.589) within the recommended range of ± 2.58 [55] also indicated that the latent variables had a significant effect on the model.

6. Results and Analysis

By administrating the organized questionnaire to 391 cell phone users of Nepal Telecom and Ncell, the required information was accounted for, dissected, and deciphered. According to the sample encircled, responses were taken from understudies (56.7 %), service holders (38.9 %), business persons (2.3 %), and freelancers (2.0 %). Female (51.7 %) respondents were somewhat higher than the male (48.3 %) respondents. Even though the field study was conducted in Kathmandu valley, it covered all provinces of Nepal since the respondents regularly used to come to Kathmandu valley at one time or another. Demographically, the respondents were from: Province 1 (19.4 %), Province 2 (9.5 %), Bagmati (36.8 %), Gandaki (11.5 %), Lumbini (12.5 %), Karnali (4.6 %) and Sudur Pashchim (5.6 %). The study ensured almost equal participation from Nepal Telecom (50.1 %) and Ncell (49.9 %) and showed that 79.0 % of users carrying the pre-paid subscriber identity module (SIM) card exclusively. All the respondents had at least experience of five years or more in carrying the cell phone services in Nepal.

Descriptive statistics observed that all nine test variables except VAR_9 (signal strength and coverage) averaged more than 3.5 on a six-point Likert scale and revealed that all the test items within the constructs had the right intensity. The signal strength and coverage (VAR_9) was perceived to the lowest mean value of 3.21 (below the average mean of 3.5). Such a result indicated that cellular companies need to improve their signal strength and coverage. The respondents’ response dispersions from the mean of all indicator items were quite similar.

 The study applied structural equation modeling (SEM) to evaluate the significance of the hypothesized paths and the model’s explanatory power by computing multiple correlation coefficients for each endogenous variable. Technological and innovation performance was measured by nine test variables within two latent variables, as presented in Figure 2, and the key parameter estimates of the model shown in Table 3.

Figure 2: Technological and innovation performance model

Table 3: Parameter Estimates of the Technological and Innovation Performance Model

As presented in Table 3, the technological and innovation performance model produced statistically significant critical ratios at p ≤ 0.05 for all measuring test variables, covariance relationships between latent variables, and error terms. The testing model results produced standardized regression weights that were all significantly different from zero and above the 0.5 threshold level for a good fit, as recommended by [56]. The standardized regression weights indicated that innovation performance was a better predictor of technological and innovation performance (β = 0.743, p < 0.01) than technological performance (β = 0.152, p < 0.01). Various indices also observed to test the constructs’ model fit, as presented in Table 4.

Table 4: Model Fit Indices of the Technological and     Innovation Performance Model

All the model fit indices were fallen in the range of recommended cutoff values and evidenced an excellent fit with the technological and innovation performance model. Exemplary values of the chi-square, normed chi-square, and probability as recommended by [57], [58], revealed the absolute and parsimonious fit of the model. Values of root-mean-square residuals, the root-mean-square error of approximation, associated p-value, and goodness of fit index as recommended by [59]-[61], further proved the absolute fit of the model. Values of adjusted goodness of fit index, comparative fit index, normed fit index, and Tucker Lewis index as recommended by [59], [61], [62], supported the incremental fit of the model.

7. Discussion and Conclusion

Traditional financial measures-based backward-looking accounting systems’ dissatisfaction led to a performance measurement revolution in the late 1970s [63]. Each organization has its reasons to measure performance. So, multidimensional performance measurement systems have been acknowledged since the 1990s. Scholars from different schools of thought have used the concept of subjective information to scale organizational performance. As the guidance of contingency theory, this study explores the subjective measures of technological and innovation performance in the Nepalese scenario. A literature review of the study identified 10 observed variables within two constructs to assess technological and innovation performance. The study did not accept the test variable e-CRM (VAR_12) as the determinant of technological performance in the Nepalese scenario though it was significant in the earlier studies like [23], [24].

The latent variable ‘technological performance’ was assessed from four observed variables: network and service quality (β = 0.586, p < 0.01); signal strength and coverage (β = 0.643, p < 0.01); voice quality (β = 0.844, p < 0.01); and calls drop (β = 0.701, p < 0.01) that directly influence the technological and innovation performance. Technology and information facilitate innovation in competitive markets [64]. As consistent with the past studies like [17]-[22], [65], the study confirms that network and service quality, signal strength and coverage, voice quality, and calls drops to have significant influence to choose the cell phone operators as the service provider. That means cell phone operators must ensure good and strong technological performance measures to satisfy their subscribers. Such evidences lead to an inference that technological performance at the Nepalese scenario was significantly associated with technological and innovation performance (β = 0.152, p < 0.01).

 The latent variable ‘innovation performance’ was assessed from five observed variables: product/service innovation (β = 0.663, p < 0.01); process innovation (β = 0.702, p < 0.01); customization (β = 0.584, p < 0.01); competitive innovation (β = 0.629, p < 0.01); and marketing innovation (β = 0.565, p < 0.01). Service innovation influences customer satisfaction and retention [66] that eventually leads to better organizational performance. Process innovation applies a new method for doing something that helps an organization remain competitive and meets customer demands. Customization can govern the effectiveness of other capabilities and create higher competitive advantages [67]. Competitive innovation differentiates and adds competitive value to their products/services by adopting innovations and new technologies. Marketing innovation aims to give value to the customers and to improve competitive advantage. As consistent with previous research like [68]-[70], the study showed that the observed variables have a positive and significant effect on innovation performance. Besides, it supports the study conducted in [71] that innovation performance positively and significantly impacts technological and innovation performance. Hence, innovation culture has been pronounced as a pre-condition for improving organizational, marketing, and managerial entrepreneurship in a competitive environment [72]. In other words, the innovative capabilities have a direct and positive impact on organizational performance [69]. All the evidence lured that innovation performance in the Nepalese scenario was significantly associated with technological and innovation performance (β = 0.743, p < 0.01). As per the conceptual framework of the study, the overall model summary is presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3: The model summary

The study outcomes inferred that each of the subjective performance measures provides a partial explanation of the synergetic impacts on organizational performance. The study observed nine contingent variables that quantified two response variables to measure technological and innovation performance. The technological and innovation performance depends on a fit or math between various contingent factors. Consequently, the study concludes that the model’s validation and fit were vital because they provide empirical evidence for measuring non-financial organizational performance. More precisely, it offers the power of the Nepalese cellular telecommunications industry’s technological and innovation performance measures. It is believed that the level of technological advancement with innovativeness is an essential determinant of organizational performance.

8. Limitations and Future Research

Studies of performance measurement systems cover several disciplines, and their methodological approaches differ considerably. It made a comprehensive examination extremely challenging. As a result, only two aspects of the performance measures, technological performance measures, and innovation performance measures have been considered in this study. The study variables were developed the most straightforward ways since they could be easily understandable and the respondents could mark the structured questionnaire’s option precisely. The technological performance measures have been associated with the characteristics of mobile phone networks. In contrast, innovation performance measures have been associated with the business in general because a common respondent cannot grasp the technological essence of innovation performance measures in Nepal.

Although the analysis made for the study is rigorous and the findings significantly relatable, this study is a representative instead of a comprehensive effort. The key drawback was that the analysis used only the quantitative survey to collect the necessary information with a structured questionnaire, using the terms accessible to ordinary users. The structured questionnaire denies the opportunity to discuss many of the relevant issues of the responses. Nonetheless, all the tests have been carried out to assess the authenticity and reliability of the information obtained. The reliability could depend on the number of participants that could have been further improved by a larger sample further emphasizing on the validity and generality of the findings.

The study examined new contingent variables in the cellular industry’s organizational performance measurement system. The findings of the study will serve as a foundation for future studies to refine the theory. Researchers may consider more variables such as additional packages provided by operators, latency, security, etc. not covered in this analysis. Similarly, the ownership of firm can be integrated into the research model to identify whether the findings vary with various corporate holdings. On the other hand, future studies can concentrate on other sectors or other countries to address and compare related topics with this report. These results thus unravel the avenue for future research in various contingent variables to generalize the theory. Finally, this study hopes that the analysis findings will be useful for practitioners, researchers, or policy makers and will lead to related studies and future research as a guide.

9. Implications

Studies have shown that various performance assessment frameworks have been maintained across the world. In the case of Nepal, no corporation tends to make specific use of technological and innovative performance measures explicitly in the organizational performance process. Therefore, this study sought to analyze the effects of performance measures that could further improve the Nepalese cellular telecommunications industry’s organizational performance. The consequences of this study have been divided into two parts: practical and theoretical perspectives.

9.1.  <Practical Implications

The study results would help telecommunications industry managers recognize the customers’ perception of organizational success as a path to technical acceptance and innovation in the Nepalese scenario. The analysis provides more evidence for the various management decisions. Managers can focus on variables that obtained low weights from respondents. This study would also provide valuable guidance for identifying the critical driving variables of technical and innovative change and offer insightful knowledge on the system’s strategic areas of organizational performance evaluation.

9.2.  Theoretical Implications

The study is driven by the contingency theory, which provides a reliable lens to consider different variables and new ways to measure them. Every measure of a firm’s performance has advantages and disadvantages, and provides a prospect of success for researchers. It endeavored to fill the literature gap and address the Nepalese scenario’s issues not considered by previous researchers. On the other hand, the government can help companies innovate by leading and supervising their innovation efforts and by providing them with an amiable institutional environment.

1. A. Elrahman, A. El-Borsaly, S. Hassan, “The impact of service quality on organizational performance in the mobile telecommunications sector in Egypt,” Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 2(1), 93-104, 2020, doi: 10.24874/PES02.01.010.
2. J. Barney, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, 1(17), 99-120, 1991.
3. N. Hussein, A. Mohamad, F. Noordin, N.A. Ishak, “Learning organization and its effect on organizational performance and organizational innovativeness: A proposed framework for Malaysian Public Institutions of Higher Education,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 299-304, 2014.
4. N.A. Morgan, D. W. Vorhies, C.H. Mason, “Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909-920, 2009. doi:10.1111/1467-88963B.00097.
5. N. Venkatraman, V. Ramanujan, “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches,” Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-14, 1986.
6. T.Z.T. Mat, M. Smith, “The impact of changes in environment and AMT on management accounting practices and organizational strategy, structure and performance,” Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 12(1), 55-82, 2014.
7. Nepal Telecommunication Authority, “Management information system report,” 140(188), 1-10, July 2020.
8. M.U. Din, I.U. Mangla, M. Jamil, “Public policy, innovation and economic growth: An economic and technological perspective on Pakistan’s telecom industry,” The Lahore Journal of Economics, 21, 369-391, 2016.
9. J.A. Varela, M. del Río, “Market orientation behavior: An empirical investigation using MARKOR,” Marketing intelligence & Planning, 21(1), 6-15, 2003.
10. J.S. Chen, T.H. Tsou, A.Y.H. Huang, “Service delivery innovation: Antecedents and impact on firm performance,” Journal of Service Research, 12(1), 36-55, 2009.
11. K.H. Huarng, “A comparative study to classify ICT developments by economies,” Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1174-1177, 2011. doi:10.1111/1467-98X.00097.
12. S.P. Yeh, H-W. Fu, “Effects of service innovation on customer satisfaction in recreation industry,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 38(8), 107-116, 2013.
13. M.R. Saco, P.A. Goncalves, “Service design: An appraisal,” Design Management Review, 19(1) 10-19, 2008.
14. S.K. McEvily, K.M. Eisenhardt, J.E. Prescott, “The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies,” Strategic Management Journal, 25(8), 713–722, 2004.
15. W.J. Orlikowski, “Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations,” Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428, 2000.
16. Y. Xu, D.C. Yen, B. Lin, D.C. Chou, “Adopting customer relationship management technology,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(8), 442-452, 2002.
17. N.K. Saha, M.R. Islam, A.U. Hoque, “Factors affecting customers’ satisfaction of mobile phone subscribers: An empirical study on mobile telecommunication industry in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(6), 252-261, 2016.
18. R. Negi, “Determining customer satisfaction through perceived service quality: A study of Ethiopian mobile users, International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 4(1), 31-38, 2009.
19. S. Rahman, A. Haque, M. Ahmad, “Choice criteria for mobile telecom operator: Empirical investigation among Malaysian customers,” International Management Review, 7(1), 50-57, 2011.
20. K.S. Woo, H.K.Y. Fock, “Customer satisfaction in the Hong Kong mobile phone industry,” The Service Industries Journal, 19(3), 162–174, 1999.
21. E.T. Aire, B.T. Maharaj, L.P. Linde, “Implementation considerations in a SIP based secure voice over IP network,” in Proceedings of the 7th AFRICON, 167-172, Botswana, Africa, 2004.
22. B. Eljaam, Customer satisfaction with cellular network performance: Issues and analysis, Ph. D. Dissertation, Iowa State University, United States, 2005.
23. C. O’Leary, S. Rao, C. Perry, “Improving customer relationship management through database/internet marketing,” European Journal of Marketing, 38(3/4), 338-354, 2004.
24. N. Kim-soon, M.F. Zulkifli, “The impact of electronic customer relationship management (e-CRM) on the business performance of small company,” Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(12), 139-153, 2012.
25. M. Dachyar, L. Hananto, “Innovation and quality service factors to customer loyalty in Indonesia telecommunication company by using structural equation modeling method,” Management and Technology in Knowledge, Service, Tourism & Hospitality, 1, 41-44, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1201/b16700-10.
26. M. Polder, G.V. Leeuwen, P. Mohnen, W. Raymond, “Product, process and organizational innovation: Drivers, complementarity and productivity effects. CIRANO–Scientific Publications, 2010s-28, 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1626805
27. D.M. DeCarolis, “Competencies and imitability in the pharmaceutical industry: An analysis of their relationship with firm performance,” Journal of Management, 29(1), 27–50, 2003.
28. S. Thornhill, “Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high-and low-technology regimes,” Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687–703, 2006.
29. G. Zaefarian, S. Forkmann, M. Mitręga, S.C. Henneberg, “A capability perspective on relationship ending and its impact on product innovation success and firm performance,” Long Range Planning, 50(2), 184–199, 2017.
30. T. Dotzel, V. Shankar, L.L. Berry, “Service innovativeness and firm value,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2): 259–276, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0426.
31. A.F. Akgün, H. Ince, S.Z. Imamoglu, H. Keskin, I. Kocoglu, “The mediator role of learning capability and business innovativeness between total quality management and financial performance,” International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), 888–901, 2014.
32. T. Anning-Dorson, “Organizational culture and leadership as mediators of service innovation and firm competitiveness: A study of an emerging economy,” International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(7), 1-29, 2016b.
33. T. Anning-Dorson, “Interactivity innovations, competitive intensity, customer demand and performance,” International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 8(4), 536–554, 2016a.
34. N.N.A. Aziz, S. Samad, “Innovation and competitive advantage: Moderating effects of firm age in foods manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia,” Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 256-266, 2016.
35. M.U. Hassan, S. Shaukat, M.S. Nawaz, S. Naz, “Effects of innovation types on firm performance: An empirical study on Pakistan’s manufacturing sector,” Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 7(2), 243-262, 2013.
36. A. Rodríguez-Pose, R. Crescenzi, “Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3), 371–388, 2008.
37. H.V. Auken, A. Madrid-Guijarro, D. Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, “Innovation and performance in Spanish manufacturing SMEs,” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(1), 36-56, 2008.
38. K. B. Clark, T. Fujimoto, Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1991.
39. S. A. Zahra, G. George, “Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualisation and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203, 2002, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.6587995.
40. D. Leonard-Barton, “Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development”, Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125, 1992.
41. R. Blundell, R. Griffith, J. Van Reenen, “Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms”, Review of Economic Studies, 66(3), 529-554, 1999, DOI:10.1111/1467-937X.00097.
42. A. De Massis, F. Frattini, E. Pizzurno, L. Cassia, “Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: An exploratory analysis”, Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 1-36, 2013, DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12068.
43. C. Carmen, G. M. Jose, “The role of technological and organizational innovation in the relation between market orientation and performance in cultural organizations, European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(3), 413-434, 2008, DOI: 10.1108/14601060810889035.
44. B. Menguc, S. Auh, “Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness”, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 34(1), 63-73, 2006.
45. A. Koohang, J. Paliszkiewicz, J. Goluchowski, “The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance: A research model, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 521-537, 2017.
46. R. Krejcie, D. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educational & Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610, 1970.
47. B.L. Bowerman, R.T. O’Connell, J.B. Orris, Essential business statistics (3rd ed), McGrawHill, 2004.
48. J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, 1993.
49. L.A. Clark, D. Watson, “Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development,” Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319, 1995.
50. H.F. Kaiser, “An index of factorial simplicity,” Psychometrika, 39, 31–36, 1974.
51. C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1) 39-50, 1981.
52. R.P. Bagozzi, H. Baumgartner, The evaluation of structural equation models and hypothesis testing, In R. P. Bagozzi (ed.), Principles of marketing research 386–422, Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994.
53. L.S. Meyers, G. Gamst, A.J. Guarino, Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation, Sage Publications, Inc., 2006.
54. D. George, M. Mallery, SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.), Pearson, 2010.
55. B.M. Byrne, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concept, applications, and programming (2nd ed.), Taylor and Francis Group, 2010.
56. J.F.Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc., 2006
57. T.T.H. Wan, Evidenced-based health care management: Multivariate modeling approaches, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
58. R.B. Kline, Methodology in the social sciences: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, Guilford Press, 1998.
59. L. Hu, P. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural equation modeling – A multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55, 1999.
60. G.D. Garson, “Structural equation modeling”, 2009, http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/structur.htm
61. R. Bagozzi, Y. Yi, “On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94, 1988.
62. P.M. Bentler, D.G. Bonnet, “Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures,” Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606, 1980.
63. S. S. Nudurupati, U.S. Bititci, V. Kumar, “State of the art literature review on performance measurement,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(2), 279-290, 2011.
64. A. Sood, G. J. Tellis, “Do innovations really pay off? Total stock market returns to innovation, Marketing Science, 28(3), 442–456, 2009.
65. S. Khan, S. Afsheen, “Determinants of customer satisfaction in telecom industry–A study of telecom industry Peshawar KPK Pakistan,” Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(12), 12833-12840, 2012.
66. S. Salunke, J. Weerawardena, J.R. McColl-Kennedy, “Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms,” Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1085-1097, 2013.
67. C. K. Prahalad, V. Ramaswamy, “Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14, 2004.
68. S. Afriyie, J. Du, K. Appiah, A-A. I. Musah, “The nexus between types of innovation and marketing performance of SME in an emerging economy,” International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(6), 78–92, 2018, https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.7042
69. L.F. Hsieh, L.H. Lin, “A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan – An application of the relational network DEA,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 14–24, 2010.
70. S. Yıldız, F. Baştürk, I. T. Boz, “The effect of leadership and innovativeness on business performance,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 785–793, 2014.
71. V.H. Nam, “The roles of human and social capital in the development of manufacturing SMEs in Vietnam, Journal of Economic Development, 16(1), 5-22, 2014, https://doi.org/10.33301/2014.16.01.01.
72. H. Aksoy, “How do innovation culture, marketing innovation and product innovation affect the market performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)?” Technology in Society, 51, 133-141, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.08.005.

Citations by Dimensions

Citations by PlumX

Google Scholar

Crossref Citations

1. Izuchukwu Francis Okafor, Mustapha Abdullahi, Bappah Adamu Umar, Kelechi U. Adie, "Investigating the Influence Biomass Additive on the Thermal Performance of a Fired-Clay for Producing the Inner Liner of a Biomass Cook-Stove", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2026. doi: 10.25046/aj110107
2. Marlene Böhmer, Thorsten Herfet, "PerfVis+: From Timestamps to Insight through Integration of Visual and Statistical Analysis", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 77–87, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100607
3. Glender Brás, Samara Leal, Breno Sousa, Gabriel Paes, Cleberson Junior, João Souza, Rafael Assis, Tamires Marques, Thiago Teles Calazans Silva, "Machine Learning Methods for University Student Performance Prediction in Basic Skills based on Psychometric Profile", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100401
4. Ya Gao, Fatma Layas, Xiangyu Dong, Yijing Li, Jiayi Li, "A Study of the Digital Health Management Needs of the Elderly", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 42–48, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100205
5. Surapol Vorapatratorn, Nontawat Thongsibsong, "AI-Based Photography Assessment System using Convolutional Neural Networks", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 28–34, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100203
6. WaiYie Leong, LeeSun Heng, YuanZhi Leong, "Malaysia’s Renewable Energy Policy and its Impact on ASEAN Countries", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 67–73, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090208
7. Mauricio Flores-Nicolás, Magally Martínez-Reyes, Felipe de Jesús Matías-Torres, "The Graded Multidisciplinary Model: Fostering Instructional Design for Activity Development in STEM/STEAM Education", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 55–61, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080506
8. Fadwa Bouhannana, Akram El Korchi, "Application of Lean Practices in Food Supply Chain: The Case of Morocco", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 101–110, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080412
9. Hendra Kusuma, Muhammad Attamimi, Julius Sintara, "Navigation Aid Device for Visually Impaired using Depth Camera", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 48–53, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080306
10. Temsamani Khallouk Yassine, Achchab Said, Laouami Lamia, Faridi Mohammed, "Hybrid Discriminant Neural Networks for Performance Job Prediction", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 116–122, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080213
11. Ossama Embarak, "Multi-Layered Machine Learning Model For Mining Learners Academic Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 850–861, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060194
12. Richard Romero Izurieta, Segundo Moisés Toapanta Toapanta, Luis Jhony Caucha Morales, María Mercedes Baño Hifóng, Eriannys Zharayth Gómez Díaz, Oscar Marcelo Zambrano Vizuete, Luis Enrique Mafla Gallegos, José Antonio Orizaga Trejo, "Prototype to Identify the Capacity in Cybersecurity Management for a Public Organization", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 108–115, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080113
13. Luís Cláudio Dallier Saldanha, "A Review of the Role of Information Technology in Brazilian Higher Educational Institutions during Covid-19 Pandemic", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 189–194, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070620
14. Penio Lebamovski, "Advantages of 3D Technology in Stereometry Training", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 39–48, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070605
15. Angela Pearce, "The Perceptions of Students and Teachers When using ICTs for Educational Practices Matter: A Systematic Review", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1–12, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070601
16. Deeptaanshu Kumar, Ajmal Thanikkal, Prithvi Krishnamurthy, Xinlei Chen, Pei Zhang, "Analysis of Different Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Accelerometer-Based Alcohol Consumption Detection from Physical Activity", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 147–154, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070419
17. Jérémy Quignon, Anthony Tornambe, Thibaut Deleruyelle, Philippe Pannier, "Antenna System Design To Increase Power Transfer Efficiency with NFC Wireless Charging Technology", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 123–128, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070314
18. Aicha Lamjahdi, Hafida Bouloiz, Maryam Gallab, "Heuristic Analysis of Overall Performance Measurement Perception and Management in Automotive Industry", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070301
19. Lucie Böhmová, Antonín Pavlíček, "Innovations in Recruitment—Social Media", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 88–97, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060613
20. Leidy Dayhana Guarin Manrique, Hugo Ernesto Martínez Ardila, Luis Eduardo Becerra Ardila, "Intermediation in Technology Transfer Processes in Agro-Industrial Innovation Systems: State of Art", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 66–75, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060610
21. Boris Kontsevoi, Sergei Terekhov, "TETRA™ Techniques to Assess and Manage the Software Technical Debt", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 303–309, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060534
22. Caglar Arslan, Selen Sipahio?lu, Emre ?afak, Mesut Gözütok, Tacettin Köprülü, "Comparative Analysis and Modern Applications of PoW, PoS, PPoS Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms and New Distributed Ledger Technologies", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 279–290, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060531
23. Maroua Barha, Soumaia Hmimou, Mounir Ait Kerroum, Hamid Ait Lemqeddem, "The Internal Reliability of a Questionnaire on the Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning on the Performance of Moroccan Companies", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 59–64, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060508
24. Radwan Qasrawi, Stephanny VicunaPolo, Diala Abu Al-Halawa, Sameh Hallaq, Ziad Abdeen, "Predicting School Children Academic Performance Using Machine Learning Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 08–15, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060502
25. Rafael Souza Cotrim, João Manuel Leitão Pires Caldeira, Vasco Nuno da Gama de Jesus Soares, Pedro Miguel de Figueiredo Dinis Oliveira Gaspar, "Power Saving MAC Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Performance Assessment Analysis", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 341–347, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060438
26. Piwai Chikasha, Kemlall Ramdass, Ndivhuwo Ndou, Rendani Maladzhi, Kgabo Mokgohloa, "Industrial Engineers of the Future – A Concept for a Profession that is Evolving", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 72–79, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060409
27. Juanita Juanita, Titus Hari Setiawan, Anwar Ma’ruf, "The Operational Performance of Mass Transportation Before Covid-19 and New Normal Life: Case Study BRT TransJateng, Central Java", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 361–366, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060342
28. Abderrahmane Ouddasser, Anass Mellouki, Yassine Belyagou, Kamal Yazzif, "The health Sector Between Innovation and Organizational Performance: Applied Research in Moroccan Hospitals", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 277–285, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060331
29. Julies David Bryan, Tranos Zuva, "A Review on TAM and TOE Framework Progression and How These Models Integrate", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 137–145, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060316
30. Md Mahmudul Hasan, Nafiul Hasan, Dil Afroz, Ferdaus Anam Jibon, Md. Arman Hossen, Md. Shahrier Parvage, Jakaria Sulaiman Aongkon, "Electroencephalogram Based Medical Biometrics using Machine Learning: Assessment of Different Color Stimuli", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 27–34, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060304
31. Tuga Mauritsius, Annisa Safira Braza, "Factors Affecting Behavioural Intention to Shop in Self-Service Retail Case Study: JD.ID X Mart", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 285–294, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060233
32. Erick Fernando, Meyliana Meyliana, Harco Leslie Hendric Spits Warnars, Edi Abdurachman, Surjandy Surjandy, "Blockchain Technology-Based Good Distribution Practice Model of Pharmacy Industry in Indonesia", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 267–273, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060230
33. Amany Khalil, Osama Tolba, Sherif Ezzeldin, "Design Optimization of Open Office Building Form for Thermal Energy Performance using Genetic Algorithm", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 254–261, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060228
34. Yousra Karim, Abdelghani Cherkaoui, "Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method Applied to Assess and Improve Human and Organizational Factors Maturity in Mining Industry", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 75–84, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060210
35. Futra Zamsyah Md Fadzil, Alireza Mousavi, Morad Danishvar, "Event Modeller Data Analytic for Harmonic Failures", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1343–1359, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601154
36. Ayodele Periola, Akintunde Alonge, Kingsley Ogudo, "Underwater Computing Systems and Astronomy–Multi-Disciplinary Research Potential and Benefits", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1000–1011, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601111
37. Abdulla Alsharhan, Said Salloum, Khaled Shaalan, "The Impact of eLearning as a Knowledge Management Tool in Organizational Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 928–936, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601102
38. Desman Hidayat, Edi Abdurachman, Elidjen, Yanthi Hutagaol, "The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Knowledge Creation-Firm Performance Nexus: Evidence from Indonesian IT Companies", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 922–927, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601101
39. Lesia Marushchak, Olha Pavlykivska, Galyna Liakhovych, Oksana Vakun, Nataliia Shveda, "Accounting Software in Modern Business", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 862–870, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060195
40. Erick Fernando, Meyliana, Harco Leslie Hendric Spits Warnars, Edi Abdurachman, "Blockchain Technology for Tracing Drug with a Multichain Platform: Simulation Method", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 765–769, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060184
41. Meyliana, Yakob Utama Chandra, Cadelina Cassandra, Surjandy, Erick Fernando, Henry Antonius Eka Widjaja, Andy Effendi, Ivan sangkereng, Charles Joseph, Harjanto Prabowo, "Recording of Student Attendance with Blockchain Technology to Avoid Fake Presence Data in Teaching Learning Process", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 742–747, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060181
42. Deddy Kurniawan, Ditdit Nugeraha Utama, "Decision Support Model using FIM Sugeno for Assessing the Academic Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 605–611, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060165
43. Amin S. Ibrahim, Khaled Y Youssef, Mohamed Abouelatta, "Traffic Aggregation Techniques for Optimizing IoT Networks", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 509–518, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060156
44. Mochammad Haldi Widianto, "Analysis of Pharmaceutical Company Websites using Innovation Diffusion Theory and Technology Acceptance Model", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 464–471, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060150
45. Carol Dineo Diale, Mukondeleli Grace Kanakana-Katumba, Rendani Wilson Maladzhi, "Environmental Entrepreneurship as an Innovation Catalyst for Social Change: A Systematic Review as a Basis for Future Research", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 393–400, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060145
46. Najat Messaoudi, Jaafar Khalid Naciri, Bahloul Bensassi, "Mathematical Modelling of Output Responses and Performance Variations of an Education System due to Changes in Input Parameters", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 327–335, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060137
47. Ndiatenda Ndou, Ritesh Ajoodha, Ashwini Jadhav, "A Case Study to Enhance Student Support Initiatives Through Forecasting Student Success in Higher-Education", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 230–241, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060126
48. Yanet Cruz Flores, Tania Retuerto-Azaña, Jaquelin Nuñez-Artica, Brian Meneses-Claudio, Hernan Matta Solis, Lourdes Matta-Zamudio, "Lifestyle in Nursing Students at a University of North Lima", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 164–168, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060118
49. Lonia Masangu, Ashwini Jadhav, Ritesh Ajoodha, "Predicting Student Academic Performance Using Data Mining Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 153–163, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060117
50. Tedi Priatna, Dian Sa’adillah Maylawati, Hamdan Sugilar, Muhammad Ali Ramdhani, "Social Engineering to Establish Digital Culture in Higher Education", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1474–1479, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506177
51. Clara Silveira, Leonilde Reis, Vitor Santos, Henrique S. Mamede, "Creativity in Prototypes Design and Sustainability – The case of Social Organizations", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1237–1243, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506147
52. Nin Hayati Mohd Yusoff, Nurul Azma Zakaria, "Development and Performance Analysis of HRPL Using 6LoWPAN CC2538 Module for IoT Ecosystem", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1217–1224, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506145
53. Rendani Wilson Maladzhi, Grace Mukondeleli Kanakana-Katumba, "Evolution of Teaching Approaches for Science, Engineering and Technology within an Online Environment: A Review", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1207–1216, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506144
54. Kgabo Mokgohloa, Grace Kanakana-Katumba, Rendani Maladzhi, "Development of a Technology and Digital Transformation Adoption Framework of the Postal Industry in Southern Africa: From Critical Literature Review to a Theoretical Framework", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1190–1206, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506143
55. Asep Herry Hernawan, Mustari Bosra, "Developing a Modular Material-Based Independent Training Model for Primary School Teacher Training", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1054–1063, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506128
56. Ignacio Alvarez-Placencia, Diana Sánchez-Partida, Patricia Cano-Olivos, José-Luis Martínez-Flores, "Inventory Management Practices during COVID 19 Pandemic to Maintain Liquidity Increasing Customer Service level in an Industrial Products Company in Mexico", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 613–626, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050675
57. Pearl Keitemoge, Daniel Tetteh Narh, "Effective Application of Information System for Purchase Process Optimization", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 594–605, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050673
58. Selene Tamayo Castro, Kristian Aldapa Salcido, Linda García Rodríguez, "Proposal of a New Descriptive-Correlational Model of Population Lifestyle Analysis and Disease Diagnosis", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 555–560, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050667
59. Kamal Jaiswal, Serdar Dalkilic, Evangelos Papageorgiou, Balgopal Singh, "Aviation MRO: Impact of Physical Environment Factors on Job Performance in Aircraft Maintenance Organization", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 148–154, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050617
60. Klyagin Viktor Anatolievich, Laushin Dmitry Andreevich, "The Impact Assessment of the Errors in Determining the Mass and Zero Lift-Drag Coefficient on the Aircraft’s Performance Data", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 118–126, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050613
61. Kayode Emmanuel Oyetade, Tranos Zuva, Anneke Harmse, "Technology Adoption in Education: A Systematic Literature Review", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 108–112, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050611
62. Irin Tri Anggraini, Achmad Basuki, Nobuo Funabiki, Xiqin Lu, Chih-Peng Fan, Yu-Chung Hsu, Cheng-Hsien Lin, "A Proposal of Exercise and Performance Learning Assistant System for Self-Practice at Home", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1196–1203, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0505145
63. Thi Anh Van Nguyen, Khac Hieu Nguyen, "The Impact of Innovation on the Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises in Vietnam", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 984–990, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0505120
64. Fayza A. Nada, "Performance Analysis of Selective Repeat ARQ Protocol Used in Digital Data Transmission Over Unreliable Channels", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 927–933, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0505113
65. Chaman Verma, Zoltan Illes, Veronika Stoffova, "Student’s Belief Detection and Segmentation for Real-Time: A Case Study of Indian University", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 742–749, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050590
66. Kofi Osei-Tutu, Yeong-Tae Song, "Enterprise Architecture Institutionalization for Health Information Exchange (HIE) Cloud Migration", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 680–691, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050584
67. Mika Karjalainen, Tero Kokkonen, "Review of Pedagogical Principles of Cyber Security Exercises", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 592–600, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050572
68. Erick Fernando, Surjandy Surjandy, Meyliana Meyliana, Henry Antonius Wijadja, Desman Hidayat, Ary W Kusumaningtyas, Roni Heryatno, "Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Technology Services to Implement Self-Service Technology Case Study: Situation Pandemic Covid-19", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 342–347, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050542
69. Sanaz Gheibi, Tania Banerjee, Sanjay Ranka, Sartaj Sahni, "Fine Tuning the Performance of Parallel Codes", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 824–840, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050497
70. Supalak Sathiracheewin, Patamaporn Sripadungtham, Settakorn Kamuang, "Performance Analysis of Grid-Connected PV Rooftop, at Sakon Nakhon Province, Thailand", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 816–823, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050496
71. Fayza Ahmed Nada, "Performance Analysis of Go-Back-N ARQ Protocol Used in Data Transmission Over Noisy Channels", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 612–617, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050472
72. Fadoua Tamtam, Amina Tourabi, "Organizational Agility Assessment of a Moroccan Healthcare Organization in Times of COVID-19", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 567–576, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050467
73. Pratik Kumar Singh, Fadillah Binti Ismail, Chan Shiau Wei, Muhammad Imran, Syed Ashfaq Ahmed, "A Framework of E-Procurement Technology for Sustainable Procurement in ISO 14001 Certified Firms in Malaysia", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 424–431, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050450
74. Phathutshedzo Makovhololo, Tiko Iyamu, "Diffusion of Technology for Language Challenges in the South African Healthcare Environment", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 257–265, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050432
75. Rafidah Abd Karim, Airil Haimi Mohd Adnan, Mohd Haniff Mohd Tahir, Mohd Hafiz Mat Adam, Noorzaina Idris, Izwah Ismail, "The Application of Mobile Learning Technologies at Malaysian Universities Through Mind Mapping Apps for Augmenting Writing Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 510–517, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050363
76. Linda Acosta-Salgado, Auguste Rakotondranaivo, Eric Bonjour, "Analysis and Improvement of an Innovative Solution Through Risk Reduction: Application to Home Care for the Elderly", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 158–165, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050321
77. Md. Imdadul Hoque, Abul kalam Azad, Mohammad Abu Hurayra Tuhin, Zayed Us Salehin, "University Students Result Analysis and Prediction System by Decision Tree Algorithm", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 115–122, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050315
78. Bambang Leo Handoko, Nada Ayuanda, Ari Tihar Marpaung, "Organizational, Social and Individual Aspect on Acceptance of Computerized Audit in Financial Audit Work", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 55–61, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050308
79. Basem Assiri, "Using Leader Election and Blockchain in E-Health", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 46–54, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050307
80. Javier Nieto Cubero, Saheed Adebayo Gbadegeshin, Carolina Consolación Segura, "Commercialization Process of Disruptive Innovations in Corporate Ventures and Spinoff Companies: A Comparison", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 621–634, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050278
81. Gede Indrawan, I Made Agus Oka Gunawan, Sariyasa, "The Usability Evaluation of Academic Progress Information System (SIsKA-NG)", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 460–468, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050259
82. Yogi Udjaja, "Evolutionary Quantum Technology: The Future with Holographic Plasma Voxel", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 305–308, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050240
83. Ery Muchyar Hasiri, Asniati, Mohamad Arif Suryawan, Rasmuin, "The Implementation of Smart Farming Application Based on the Microcontroller and Automatic Sprinkler Irrigation System of Agricultural Land", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 174–179, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050222
84. Jorge Castro-Bedriñana, Doris Chirinos-Peinado, Felipe Zenteno-Vigo, Gianfranco Castro-Chirinos, "Satisfaction of Old Graduates of Zootechnical Engineering for Improvement of Educational Quality at the UNCP", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 166–173, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050221
85. Segundo Moisés Toapanta Toapanta, José David López Cobeña, Luis Enrique Mafla Gallegos, "Analysis of Cyberattacks in Public Organizations in Latin America", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050215
86. Dora Yvonne Arce Santillan, Omar Freddy Chamorro Atalaya, Yesica Pamela Leandro Chacón, Jorge Isaac Castro Bedriñana, Elizabeth Rosario Martínez Santillán, "The Proportionality of Women Graduated from the Professional Career of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering at UNTELS: Analysis of their Academic Performance and Labor Field of Action", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 368–372, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050147
87. Vladyslav Kucher, Jens Hunloh, Sergei Gorlatch, "Performance Portability and Unified Profiling for Finite Element Methods on Parallel Systems", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 119–127, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050116
88. Omar Chamorro-Atalaya, Eduardo Pizarro–Mayta, Dora Arce-Santillan, "Evaluation of the Quality Parameters of a 4G-LTE Communications Base Station, Installed in a Rural Area of Peru", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050109
89. Mariam Houti, Laila El Abbadi, Abdellah Abouabdellah, "CSFs for the Implementation of the Hybrid Lean ERP System. Stakeholders Interactions", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 443–447, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040655
90. Aref Hassan Kurd Ali, Halikul Lenando, Mohamad Alrfaay, Slim Chaoui, Haithem Ben Chikha, Akram Ajouli, "Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in Resource-Constrained Opportunistic Networks", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 402–413, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040651
91. Sevar Dilkhaz Salahaddin Neamat, "A Comparative Study of Safety Leading and Lagging Indicators Measuring Project Safety Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 306–312, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040639
92. Omar Freddy Chamorro Atalaya, Dora Yvonne Arce Santillan, Jorge Isaac Castro Bedriñana, Yesica Pamela Leandro Chacón, Martin Díaz Choque, "The Correlation of the Specific and Global Performance of Teachers in UNTELS Engineering Schools", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 196–202, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040625
93. Evaristus Didik Madyatmadja, Evaristus Didik Madyatmadja, Alvi Sasqia Putri, Siti Sabilul Hiqna, Wigna Pratita, "Data Dashboard for Decision Support Systems for Intrapreneurship in A Company", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 177–182, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040622
94. Isaac Onyeyirichukwu Chukwuma, Emmanuel Kalu Agbaeze, Nkiru Peace Nwakoby, Gertrude Chinelo Ugwuja, Fidelis Odinakachukwu Alaefule, Ifeanyi Leo Madu, "The Relationship of Coalition on Employee Spiritual Engagement: Interplay of Organisational Politics", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 45–52, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040606
95. Ramachandran Ravi Sowmiyasree, Nachimuthu Maheswari, Manickam Sivagami, "Improving the Performance of Hadoop Framework Using Optimization Process in the Information Management", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 327–333, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040542
96. Lajmi Imen, Masmoudi Wassim, Elleuch Mounir, Chtourou Hedi, "Improvement opportunities of a Simulation/Expert System Approach for Manufacturing System Sizing: A review and proposal", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 213–223, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040527
97. Rowaida Khalil Ibrahim, Subhi Rafeeq Mohammed Zeebaree, Karwan Fahmi Sami Jacksi, "Survey on Semantic Similarity Based on Document Clustering", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 115–122, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040515
98. Segundo Moisés Toapanta Toapanta, Allan Fabricio German Diaz, Darío Fernando Huilcapi Subia, Luis Enrique Mafla Gallegos, "Proposal for a Security Model for a Popular Voting System Process in Latin America", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 53–60, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040507
99. Héctor L. Núñez-Ramírez, Gloria G. Carvalho-Kassar, Freddy C. Brito-Maestre, Yaremi I. Gamboa-Maldonado, Luis A. Santos-Avendaño, Carlelines Gavidia-Toro, Orlando Villarroel-Ramos, Dino Di Rosa-Ulloa, "Low-Cost and Accurate Computational System for Efficiency Measures over Photovoltaic Arrays", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 39–45, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040505
100. Nor Aziati Abdul Hamid, Chin Wei Liew, Nor Hazana Abdullah, Siti Sarah Omar, "The Role of Information Technology Human Capability in the Implementation of Information Technology Governance (ITG): A Systematic Literature Review on Malaysian Organizations", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 314–322, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040440