1            Introduction

Several studies suggest that cyber crime and espionage frameworks are flourishing. In the United States of America the monetary loss due to cyber crime is amounted to $1,070,000,000 in 2015 [1]. The European Union was also in the focus of organized cyber crime. 15 reported major security breaches leaked more than 41 million records of sensitive information, such as credit card information, email addresses, passwords and private home addresses [2]. In the context of highly sophisticated cyber crime such as industrial espionage, digital repression and sabotage it is common to not only trust perimeter based network security [3]. Several cyber attacks and developped attack methods such as AirHopper [4] proved that even physical isolation can be circumvented. This leads to a permanent and latent threat of successful infiltrations, which are undetectable by state of the art defense mechanisms such as firewalls, antivirus, rule based intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS), network separation and user authentication. Deception systems (DS) enable in depth network defense support for the IT security concept. They mimic productive, secret or critical resources in the target system. Intruders can not distinguish between a DS and the actual resource. However, defenders easily detect intrusions because no connections, traffic and activities are expected on a DS. Any interaction with such a system can be classified as malicious. This technology therefore comes along with no false positive classifications, from which other defense in depth technologies such as anomaly detection often suffer. Typical issues for state of the art network defense are: Inside or insider attacks, encryption, highthroughput traffic, polymorphism and highly fluctuating signatures. Deception systems do not suffer any drawbacks on these issues. More than that, technology changes such as IPv6 do not impact DSs. However, there are other drawbacks coming along with DSs. A major drawback is the deployment [5]. The DS needs to mimic a actual system and additionally fit in the network structure [6]. State of the art for a proper configuration, deployment and maintenance is manual effort [7]. We state that a framework consisting of a scanning engine for context observation, a back-end database for proper storage of context information in combination with an engine for machine learning based on context analysis and a DS dependent deployment engine can solve this issue. This enables DSs for a broad range of applications and companies. Especially small and medium size companies will profit from manageable DSs, because they cannot afford cumbersome manual configuration, de-

This work is structured as follows: Since the idea of machine learning and deception in network defense is around 30 years old, we first identify recent trends and related work in chapter 2. Investigated machine learning methods as well as their advantages and drawbacks are introduced in chapter 3. In chapter 4 we propose our adaptive deployment framework and discuss important modules. The proposed framework is evaluated in chapter 5. Our work is concluded in chapter 6.

2          Related Work

In strategic defense and attack the idea of deception dates back to the 5th century BC [8]. It was first described from Clifford Stoll as digital strategy [9] in 1990 and first implemented from Lance Spitzer as network defense strategy [10].

2.1         Deception Systems

Modern DSs provide a vast variety of fake resources to deceive intruders. The most popular concept are server side systems. These systems mimic typical server protocols such as FTP, SSH or SMB. Connecting intruders trigger alarms and are under observation while they try to exploit the server. Other concepts are client side systems, which connect to potential malicious servers and observe the servers behavior. This concept is common to investigate web based attacks such as drive by downloads. A more recent concept employs tokens as trigger for alarms. Tokens impersonate documents, credentials or accounts. Stack canaries can be interpreted as token-based DS. Long-term and large scale studies with deception systems enable high quality insight in recent threats and their developments [11][12].

2.2         Deployment Strategies

Except for client-side DSs all need to be implanted in an existing and often fluctuating context. This context can be a IP-based network, a file system or any other architecture to defend. In this work we will focus on IP-based networks. There are two major groups of deployment modes: Research and production. In research mode the DS is directly connected with the Internet. In this mode its main purpose is the collection of threat intelligence, botnet observation and other trends. For non IT security companies this mode is not relevant. The production mode deploys DSs behind the perimeter. DSs in this mode typically have less interaction. However, in this mode any interaction is a strong indicator for perimeter breaches or internal misuse. In the production mode, six basic deployment concepts are prevalent [13][14]: Sacrificial lamb, deception ports on production systems, proximity decoys, redirection shield, minefield, zoo. In table 1 the different concepts are described.

State of the art deployment strategies do not employ automated deployment. Our adaptive framework supports all deployment concepts except for deception ports, since access to the production machines is not natively available. Furthermore, we argue that manipulation of software on production systems is not acceptable for most operators and vendors. This restricts the usage of the deception port concept in industrial scenarios and proprietary systems. We also argue that sacrificial lamb and zoo deployment suffer from lower attraction to intruders and less knowledge about the actual network security state. Both are implications of the deployment in a different subnetwork. Minefield deployment is a good choice to detect intrusions in an early state, but if an intruder circumvents the minefield there are no more defense in depth mechanisms. We focus on proximity decoys, since we think it is the most promising deployment concept for defense in depth strategies. Please note that redirection shield is a special case of all other concepts, where the DSs hardware is not located in the internal network, but the malicious traffic is tunneled out to an external environment.

2.3         Artificial Intelligence for Deception based Network Security

Artificial intelligence enables context-awareness. In network security this is crucial, since modern networks are heterogeneous and entities within the network can often change. To adapt DSs in these scenario several researches have been conducted. These researches can be classified in two major domains: Interaction and Deployment. Context-aware interaction focuses on decision making for DSs [15][16][17]. The adaptive deployment domain is in an early stage compared to the first usage of DSs. However, this domain decreases the probability for being fingerprinted by adapting to other entities in the network and also increases the intrusion detection probability by optimizing the ratio between DSs and production systems within a network. Conducted works are learning mechanisms of new unknown services and protocols [18], context-awareness for DSs [19] and automated configuration [20]. An overview of conducted research is given by Zakaria [21][22].

3          Unsupervised Machine Learning

The data acquired from our framework is not labeled. Even the number of clusters is unknown. To determine the optimal DSs deployment, we employ unsupervised machine learning methods to identify clusters and derive deployment prototypes. In this chapter we introduce and investigate several methods we identified as promising. These methods are later employed in our framework.

 Table 1: Deployment concepts for DSs in internal networks

3.1         Methods and Algorithms

We investigated three different clustering algorithms. All three are assigned to a different class of cluster algorithms. First is the centroid based k-medoids method [23]. In difference to the well known kmeans algorithm, k-medoids always sets an entity from within a cluster as centroid. This centroid is called medoid. As given in (1), we define the JaccardTanimoto metric [24] as distance measurement:

                                                 x  y       x              y

                               d(x,y) =                                        (1)

x ∪ y

where x and y are either a feature set of an observation or a feature set of an aggregation of observations. We employ this distance measurement as reference for all further investigations in this paper. There are, however, several distance measurements that are also feasible such as the Manhattan, Euclidean, Simpson, Dice and Mahalanobis distance [25]. The definition of the k-medoids method is given in (2):

k

X

                                  argmax         |S_i|V arS_i                                          (2)

                                        ^S             i=1

where k is the number of clusters and S =

S₁,S₂,…,S_k the sets of all observations.

Our evaluation is based on the partition around medoids (PAM) [23] implementation. PAM is a heuristic method, employed to circumvent the NP-hardness of k-medoids.

Second is the connectivity based single linkage clustering [26]. We also chose the Jaccard-Tanimoto distance as distance measurement to ensure comparability. The single linkage method is an agglomerative hierarchical clustering method. All observations are considered as cluster and then merged into an agglomeration of clusters based on the distance between the clusters. The distance is calculated by a linkage function, which is given in (3) for the single linkage method

                               D(S_i,S_j) =       min     d(u,v)                        (3)

u∈Si,v∈Sj

where D is the linkage function, S_i and S_j are subsets of S, u is a observation in cluster S_i and v a observation in cluster S_j. In our experiments we found that more complex linkage functions such as WPGMA, UPGMA and WPGMC do not significantly improve the results of our application. We used the SLINK implementation [27] to decrease the time complexity from O(n²log(n)) to O(n²).

Finally, we evaluated the density based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) method [28]. DBSCAN defines a distance measurement d(x,y) and a minimal number of observations minP ts that need to be in a certain distance  of a given observation x to consider the observation x as part of the cluster. If a observation x is within the distance  of less than minP ts observations, it is considered as cluster edge and is part of the cluster. The

Jaccard-Tanimoto metric is employed as d(x,y).

All three methods imply different advantages and disadvantages. A comparison is given in table 2.

It can be seen that the optimal algorithm depends on the application. Determining a suitable method requires an understanding of the data set. In our application it is not possible to assume a certain distribution of systems within a network. The diversity of clusters and the occurrence of outliers depend on the network architecture.

3.2         Convergence Criteria

The introduced algorithms require a proper parametrization to ensure reasonable results. Even methods that need no predetermination of k need parameters to calculate k.

We employed three methods to estimate the convergence criteria: The Elbow method, the GAP method and the Silhouette coefficient. An increasing number of clusters decrease the mean squared error (MSE). The MSE is defined as follows:

k

                                         X X                   2

  u − µi                 (4) i=1 u∈S_i

where k is the number of clusters, u an observation in cluster S_i and µ_i the mean value of S_i. The elbow method [29] investigates, if further incrementation of the number of clusters do significantly decrease the MSE. If the decrease is not significant, the optimal number of clusters is found. The GAP method [30] is based on the elbow method, but instead of ^∆MSE_∆k , the maximal difference between the MSE of the elbow function and the MSE of randomly distributed observations indicates the optimal number of clusters. A widely employed method to determine the number of clusters in machine learning applications is the silhouette coefficient [31]. The definition is given in (5).

Table 2: Comparison of different clustering algorithms

            0                                          for dist(S_i,u) = 0

sj = ^_^maxdist{dist(S_v(,uS_i),u−dist),dist(S(_iS,u_v,u) )}                                     else       (5)

The distance measure for the silhouette method based on (1). For the distance between an observation and a cluster, the mean value of the cluster is employed as defined in (6) and (7).

1 X

The distance between S_j and u is the difference as defined in (1) to the nearest cluster S_y ∈ S. For an evaluation we will employ the three introduced convergence criteria.

4          Adaptive Deployment Framework

We developed an adaptive deployment framework consisting of a data acquisition engine (DAE), a clustering engine (CE) and a deployment engine (DE). A specific data format was also developed. In this chapter we describe our framework and the single components. The adaptive deployment consists of four consecutive processes: Context perception, context evaluation, configuration and deployment. In the first step the DAE collects context information such as other hosts. The acquired data is then stored in our data format. Based on this data, the CE statistically analyzes the stored data and determines k prototypes P . These prototypes P are DSs that are mind(P ,S_i). The configuration process depends on the DE. In general, however, the required configuration file is generated in this process. Finally, the DE deploys the DSs based on the configuration file. The overall process of adaptive deployment is restartable at any time. This enables a fast adaption to changing architectures and contexts. The process is shown in Figure 1.

4.1         Data Acquisition Engine

The DAE captures the context and stores it in a defined data format. In our implementation we define the other hosts in the same subnetwork as context.

To capture as much information as possible about the context, the DAE combines passive information gathering by p0f [32] and active information gathering by nmap [33] and xprobe [34]. For each host in the subnetwork the information sources decide by vote for an operating system. The services available from a host are determined by nmap.

4.2         Data Format

The data format we developed is based on the Extensible Markup Language (XML). First an unique identifier (ID) is generated for each host. These IDs are associated with features. There are three major sections: meta data, services and operating system. The first section contains available meta data such as up time, MAC address, IP address and a time stamp. In the second section open TCP and UDP ports are listed. We map port numbers directly to services. This is efficient and produces sufficiently reliable results. In the third section we store information about the TCP stack based fingerprint. This information is extracted from the nmap and xprobe scan.

4.3         Clustering Engine

In the CE the prototypes for the deployment are generated. These prototypes need to contain all information that is needed for a sufficient deployment. In our implementation we employ the same data format for context information and prototypes. The CE determines k clusters containing S_i hosts. The TCP stack and the available services for each P are equal to the medoid in S_i. However, meta information is generated on distributions within S_i. For example the MAC address: The first three octetes are extracted from the most prevalent vendor within S_i and the other three are chosen randomly. For the IP address we developed an algorithm to reduce impact on the distribution in subnetworks. First a random IP within the cluster is chosen then the upwards next unoccupied IP address is assigned to the prototype. By the use of this algorithm the distribution within the cluster remains the same, since a specific probability distribution is preserved if only uniformly distributed observations are added on the existing observations. Please note that IP addresses are only assigned to one host at the same time and therefore the distribution is not perfectly preserved. Uptimes for prototypes are determined based on the mean uptime within a cluster.

Figure 1: Overall process of the adaptive deployment framework

4.4         Deployment Engine

In a last step the actual deployment is executed. This step is most crucial to all previous steps. The required information for a proper configuration needs to be calculated or assumed. In our implementation we employ honeyd [35] as DE. honeyd is able to emulate a vast amount of hosts with TCP stack and offers the ability to open TCP and UDP ports as well as the execution of scripts to emulate services on the open ports. If it is needed honeyd is also able to emulate large network architectures including network elements such as routers, switches and tunnels [36].

5          Evaluation

In the evaluation chapter two different settings are investigated. First, an artificial scenario is evaluated. This scenario consists of several virtual machines (VMs) in an isolated network. The second scenario is an actual production network in which we deploy DSs by our framework.

5.1         Artificial Data Sets

As shown in table 3 eight different VMs are prepared for the simulation of a production network: Windows 10, Windows 7, Ubuntu 17.04, Ubuntu 12.04, Debian 8.8.0, Fedora 25, openSUSE 42.2 and Android 4.3. Two scenarios are defined in this evaluation. The first scenario mimics a network with equally distributed cluster sizes. In the second scenario the cluster sizes are different. We chose these diverse settings to not favor a specific algorithm. The deployment is realized with Virtualbox.

5.2         Real World Scenario

For scenario 3 we scanned a class C development network. The network consists of: 7 Windows 10 machines, 4 Ubuntu machines, 2 TP Link switches, 2 Cisco switches, 11 Raspberry Pis, 1 Android system and 4 other Unix systems. Unlike in the artificial scenarios the configurations of the systems are different.

5.3         Results

First we evaluated the determination of the number of clusters. In Figure 2 the comparison of combinations of different methods in scenario 1 is shown.

As it can be seen for the elbow method and the silhouette coefficient all three algorithms perform similarly. However, for GAP there are differences. We found that DBSCAN is not suitable when using GAP. Please note, that the determined number of clusters is six in this scenario for all algorithms. This is because Ubuntu 12.04 and Ubuntu 17.04 as well as Windows 7 and Windows 10 have closely resembling TCP-Stack implementations and similar open ports in the default configuration, reducing the number of clusters from eight to six. In Figure 3 we compare the same algorithms for scenario 2.

For DBSCAN the elbow method does not give a feasible result. The GAP method results only for SLINK in suitable results. PAM as well as DBSCAN result in a number of clusters of four. The silhouette coefficient only results in suitable values for the PAM. Figure 4 compares the results for the development network.

DBSCAN is not feasible with any convergence criteria in this scenario. This fits in our overall evaluation. However, it is recommend to estimate  not on the number of cluster, but on the k-distance graph for DBSCAN. By doing so the results are probably better.

PAM and SLINK both result in reliable values for the

Table 3: Definition of the investigated scenarios

Figure 2: Evaluation of algorithms to estimate the number of clusters in Scenario 1

Figure 3: Evaluation of algorithms to estimate the number of clusters in Scenario 2

Figure 4: Evaluation of algorithms to estimate the number of clusters in Scenario 3

Table 4: Relative error for the estimation of the number of clusters

Table 5: Relative error for the estimation of the entities within the clusters in scenario 1

Table 6: Relative error for the estimation of the entities within the clusters in scenario 2

elbow method and the silhouette coefficient. The overall performance evaluation is given in Table 4.

Comparing the algorithms the best results are achieved for the SLINK implementation. For the convergence criteria the elbow method appears to provide the best results. However, the elbow method requires an additional criterion for the detection of the elbow. Formally a criterion detecting significant changes for ^∆MSE_∆k is required. These criteria tend to be unreliable [37]. For the silhouette coefficient it is also difficult to detect a reliable number of clusters. This is because the local maximum before a monotonic increase determines the optimal number of clusters and this maximum can be ambiguous, as shown in Figure

Besides the optimal number of clusters the clustering results are of importance for the adaptive deployment. In scenario 1 eight clusters are existing, all with the same size. In Table 5 the clustering results are evaluated. As similarity measurement we employ the Jaccard index.

In scenario 1 PAM performed best. This is as expected since a particular strength of centroid based clustering algorithms are equally sized clusters. However, in networks an equal distribution of hard- and software cannot be assumed. To evaluate also heterogeneous environments, scenario 2 features an unequal distribution of systems.

It can be seen, that SLINK and DBSCAN outperform PAM clearly. This result was expected since connection and density based algorithms are better suited for unequal sized clusters. The obtained results in our experiment suggest, that SLINK in combination with the elbow method or GAP produce the best results. However, since we did not compare SLINK with other connection based clustering algorithms, it is possible that other algorithms outperform the single linkage algorithm. The proposed method of an adaption of the DS to the context by observing and scanning the network and determining prevalent systems to mimic is possible by an employment of the investigated methods.

6          Conclusion and Discussion

In this work the authors proposed an adaptive framework for the deployment of deception systems for cyber defense. The proposed framework is implemented for an evaluation. Different algorithms and convergence criteria are evaluated in different aspects such as computational time, determination of the number of clusters and the cluster accuracy. The focus of the implementation are server-side deception systems. However, the framework can easily be extended to feature also token based deception systems. We found that SLINK provides the best results. Even though the lowest error was achieved for the elbow convergence criteria, we recommend to consider GAP in this application because of its robustness and the simple determination of the global maximum. The adaptive deployment framework enables deception based security mechanisms for a broad range of users and a significant decrease in configuration, deployment and maintenance effort of such systems. It provides an enhanced security concept in a simple to use solution.

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment This work has been supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of the Federal Republic of Germany (Foerderkennzeichen KIS4ITS0001, IUNO). The authors alone are responsible for the content of the paper.

1. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Internet crime report 2015. 2015.
2. Europol. Internet organized crime threat assessment. 2016.
3. Bundesamt fur Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik. Die Lage der IT-Sicherheit in Deutschland 2015. 2015.
4. M. Guri, G. Kedman, A. Kachlon, and Y. Elovici. Airhopper: Bridging the air-gap between isolated networks and mobile phones using radio frequencies. International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software, 9, 2014.
5. L. Spitzner. Dynamic honeypots. 2003.
6. D. Fraunholz, F. Pohl, and H. Schotten. Towards basic design principles for high- and medium-interaction honeypots. European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, 16, 2017.
7. R. Grimes. Honeypots for Windows: Configure and Manage Windows Honeypots. 2005.
8. Sun-tzu and S. Griffith. The Art of War. 1964.
9. C. Stoll. The cuckoo’s egg: Tracking a spy through the maze of computer espionage. 1990.
10. L. Spitzner. Honeypots: catching the insider threat. Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 19:170–179, 2003.
11. D. Fraunholz, M. Zimmermann, S. Duque Anton, S. Schneider, and H. Schotten. Distributed and highly-scalable wan net- work attack sensing and sophisticated analysing framework based on honeypot technology. International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering, 7, 2017.
12. D. Fraunholz, D. Krohmer, S. Duque Anton, and H. Schotten. Investigation of cyber crime conducted by abusing weak or default passwords with a medium interaction honeypot. International Conference On Cyber Security And Protection Of Digital Services, 2017.
13. D. Moran. Trapping and tracking hackers: Collective security for survival in the internet age. Information Survivability Workshop, 3, 2000.
14. B. Scottberg, W. Yurcik, and D. Doss. Internet honeypots: Protection or entrapment? 2003.
15. G. Wagener, R. State, A. Dulaunoy, and T. Engel. Heliza: talking dirty to the attackers. Computer Virology, 2010.
16. G. Wagener. Self-Adaptive Honeypots Coercing and Assessing Attacker Behaviour. PhD thesis, Universite du Luxembourg, 2011.
17. G. Wagener, R. State, T. Engel, and A. Dulaunoy. Adaptive and self-configurable honeypots. IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, 12:345–352, 2011.
18. V. Chowdhary, A. Tongaonkar, and T. Chiueh. Towards automatic learning of valid services for honeypots. International Conference Distributed Computing and Internet Technology, 1.
19. C. Hecker, K. Nance, and B. Hay. Dynamic honeypot construction. Colloqium for Inforation Systems Security Education, 10:95–102, 2006.
20. C. Leita, K. Mermoud, and M. Dacier. Scriptgen: an automated script generation tool for honeyd. Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 21, 2005.
21. W. Zakaria and L. Kiah. A review on artificial intelligence techniques for developing intelligent honeypot. 2012.
22. W. Zakaria and L. Kiah. A review of dynamic and intelligent honeypots. ScienceAsia, 2013.
23. L. Kaufmann and Rousseeuwm R. Clustering by means of medoids. 1987.
24. P. Jaccard. Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des alpes et des jura. Bulletin de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37(547-579), 1901.
25. P. Mahalanobis. On the generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Science of India, pages 49– 55, 1936.
26. J. Gower and G. Ross. Minimum spanning trees and single linkage cluster analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, pages 54–64, 1969.
27. R. Sibson. Slink: an optimally efficient algorithm for the single-link cluster method. The Computer Journal, pages 30– 34, 1973.
28. M. Ester, H. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2, 1996.
29. R. Thorndike. Who belongs in the family? Psychometrika, 18:267–276, 1953.
30. R. Tibshirani, Waltherm G., and T. Hastie. Estimating the number of clusters in a dataset via the gap statistic. 2000.
31. P. Rousseuw. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Computational and Applied Mathematics, pages 53–65, 1987.
32. M. Zalewski. p0f v3: Passive fingerprinter. 2012.
33. F. Vaskovich. The art of port scanning. Phrack Magazine, 7, 1997.
34. A. Ofir and F. Yarochkin. Xprobe2 – a fuzzy approach to remote active operating system fingerprinting. 2003.
35. N. Provos. Honeyd: A virtual honeypot daemon. DFN-CERT Workshop, 10, 2003.
36. R. Chandran and S. Pakala. Simulating networks with honeyd. 2003.
37. D. Fraunholz, M. Zimmermann, and H. Schotten. An adaptive honeypot configuration, deployment and maintenance strategy. International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 19, 2017.

Citations by Dimensions

Citations by PlumX

Google Scholar

Crossref Citations

1. Vikas Thammanna Gowda, Landis Humphrey, Aiden Kadoch, YinBo Chen, Olivia Roberts, "Multi Attribute Stratified Sampling: An Automated Framework for Privacy-Preserving Healthcare Data Publishing with Multiple Sensitive Attributes", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51–68, 2026. doi: 10.25046/aj110106
2. Kohinur Parvin, Eshat Ahmad Shuvo, Wali Ashraf Khan, Sakibul Alam Adib, Tahmina Akter Eiti, Mohammad Shovon, Shoeb Akter Nafiz, "Computationally Efficient Explainable AI Framework for Skin Cancer Detection", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2026. doi: 10.25046/aj110102
3. David Degbor, Haiping Xu, Pratiksha Singh, Shannon Gibbs, Donghui Yan, "StradNet: Automated Structural Adaptation for Efficient Deep Neural Network Design", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 29–41, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100603
4. Glender Brás, Samara Leal, Breno Sousa, Gabriel Paes, Cleberson Junior, João Souza, Rafael Assis, Tamires Marques, Thiago Teles Calazans Silva, "Machine Learning Methods for University Student Performance Prediction in Basic Skills based on Psychometric Profile", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100401
5. khawla Alhasan, "Predictive Analytics in Marketing: Evaluating its Effectiveness in Driving Customer Engagement", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 45–51, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100306
6. Khalifa Sylla, Birahim Babou, Mama Amar, Samuel Ouya, "Impact of Integrating Chatbots into Digital Universities Platforms on the Interactions between the Learner and the Educational Content", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100103
7. Ahmet Emin Ünal, Halit Boyar, Burcu Kuleli Pak, Vehbi Çağrı Güngör, "Utilizing 3D models for the Prediction of Work Man-Hour in Complex Industrial Products using Machine Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 01–11, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090601
8. Haruki Murakami, Takuma Miwa, Kosuke Shima, Takanobu Otsuka, "Proposal and Implementation of Seawater Temperature Prediction Model using Transfer Learning Considering Water Depth Differences", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 01–06, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090401
9. Brandon Wetzel, Haiping Xu, "Deploying Trusted and Immutable Predictive Models on a Public Blockchain Network", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 72–83, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090307
10. Anirudh Mazumder, Kapil Panda, "Leveraging Machine Learning for a Comprehensive Assessment of PFAS Nephrotoxicity", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 62–71, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090306
11. Taichi Ito, Ken’ichi Minamino, Shintaro Umeki, "Visualization of the Effect of Additional Fertilization on Paddy Rice by Time-Series Analysis of Vegetation Indices using UAV and Minimizing the Number of Monitoring Days for its Workload Reduction", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 29–40, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090303
12. Henry Toal, Michelle Wilber, Getu Hailu, Arghya Kusum Das, "Evaluation of Various Deep Learning Models for Short-Term Solar Forecasting in the Arctic using a Distributed Sensor Network", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 12–28, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090302
13. Tinofirei Museba, Koenraad Vanhoof, "An Adaptive Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning Model for Credit Card Fraud Detection", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 01–11, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090301
14. Marco I. Bonelli, Jiahao Liu, "Revolutionizing Robo-Advisors: Unveiling Global Financial Markets, AI-Driven Innovations, and Technological Landscapes for Enhanced Investment Decisions", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 33–44, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090205
15. Toya Acharya, Annamalai Annamalai, Mohamed F Chouikha, "Optimizing the Performance of Network Anomaly Detection Using Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) and Over-sampling for Imbalance Network Traffic Data", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 144–154, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080614
16. Renhe Chi, "Comparative Study of J48 Decision Tree and CART Algorithm for Liver Cancer Symptom Analysis Using Data from Carnegie Mellon University", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 57–64, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080607
17. Ng Kah Kit, Hafeez Ullah Amin, Kher Hui Ng, Jessica Price, Ahmad Rauf Subhani, "EEG Feature Extraction based on Fast Fourier Transform and Wavelet Analysis for Classification of Mental Stress Levels using Machine Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 46–56, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080606
18. Nizar Sakli, Chokri Baccouch, Hedia Bellali, Ahmed Zouinkhi, Mustapha Najjari, "IoT System and Deep Learning Model to Predict Cardiovascular Disease Based on ECG Signal", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 08–18, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080602
19. Kitipoth Wasayangkool, Kanabadee Srisomboon, Chatree Mahatthanajatuphat, Wilaiporn Lee, "Accuracy Improvement-Based Wireless Sensor Estimation Technique with Machine Learning Algorithms for Volume Estimation on the Sealed Box", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 108–117, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080313
20. Chaiyaporn Khemapatapan, Thammanoon Thepsena, "Forecasting the Weather behind Pa Sak Jolasid Dam using Quantum Machine Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 54–62, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080307
21. Der-Jiun Pang, "Hybrid Machine Learning Model Performance in IT Project Cost and Duration Prediction", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 108–115, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080212
22. Paulo Gustavo Quinan, Issa Traoré, Isaac Woungang, Ujwal Reddy Gondhi, Chenyang Nie, "Hybrid Intrusion Detection Using the AEN Graph Model", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 44–63, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080206
23. Ossama Embarak, "Multi-Layered Machine Learning Model For Mining Learners Academic Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 850–861, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060194
24. Segundo Moisés Toapanta Toapanta, Rodrigo Humberto Del Pozo Durango, Luis Enrique Mafla Gallegos, Eriannys Zharayth Gómez Díaz, Yngrid Josefina Melo Quintana, Joan Noheli Miranda Jimenez, Ma. Roció Maciel Arellano, José Antonio Orizaga Trejo, "Prototype to Mitigate the Risks, Vulnerabilities and Threats of Information to Ensure Data Integrity", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 139–150, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070614
25. Tarek Nouioua, Ahmed Hafid Belbachir, "The Security of Information Systems and Image Processing Supported by the Quantum Computer: A review", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 77–86, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070609
26. Roy D Gregori Ayon, Md. Sanaullah Rabbi, Umme Habiba, Maoyejatun Hasana, "Bangla Speech Emotion Detection using Machine Learning Ensemble Methods", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 70–76, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070608
27. Deeptaanshu Kumar, Ajmal Thanikkal, Prithvi Krishnamurthy, Xinlei Chen, Pei Zhang, "Analysis of Different Supervised Machine Learning Methods for Accelerometer-Based Alcohol Consumption Detection from Physical Activity", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 147–154, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070419
28. Zhumakhan Nazir, Temirlan Zarymkanov, Jurn-Guy Park, "A Machine Learning Model Selection Considering Tradeoffs between Accuracy and Interpretability", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 72–78, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070410
29. Ayoub Benchabana, Mohamed-Khireddine Kholladi, Ramla Bensaci, Belal Khaldi, "A Supervised Building Detection Based on Shadow using Segmentation and Texture in High-Resolution Images", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 166–173, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070319
30. Tiny du Toit, Hennie Kruger, Lynette Drevin, Nicolaas Maree, "Deep Learning Affective Computing to Elicit Sentiment Towards Information Security Policies", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 152–160, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070317
31. Toshiki Watanabe, Hiroyuki Kameda, "Designing a Model of Consciousness Based on the Findings of Jungian Psychology", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 356–361, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060540
32. Caglar Arslan, Selen Sipahio?lu, Emre ?afak, Mesut Gözütok, Tacettin Köprülü, "Comparative Analysis and Modern Applications of PoW, PoS, PPoS Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms and New Distributed Ledger Technologies", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 279–290, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060531
33. Osaretin Eboya, Julia Binti Juremi, "iDRP Framework: An Intelligent Malware Exploration Framework for Big Data and Internet of Things (IoT) Ecosystem", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 185–202, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060521
34. Arwa Alghamdi, Graham Healy, Hoda Abdelhafez, "Machine Learning Algorithms for Real Time Blind Audio Source Separation with Natural Language Detection", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 125–140, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060515
35. Baida Ouafae, Louzar Oumaima, Ramdi Mariam, Lyhyaoui Abdelouahid, "Survey on Novelty Detection using Machine Learning Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 73–82, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060510
36. Nuobei Shi, Qin Zeng, Raymond Shu Tak Lee, "The Design and Implementation of Intelligent English Learning Chabot based on Transfer Learning Technology", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 32–42, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060505
37. Radwan Qasrawi, Stephanny VicunaPolo, Diala Abu Al-Halawa, Sameh Hallaq, Ziad Abdeen, "Predicting School Children Academic Performance Using Machine Learning Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 08–15, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060502
38. Zhiyuan Chen, Howe Seng Goh, Kai Ling Sin, Kelly Lim, Nicole Ka Hei Chung, Xin Yu Liew, "Automated Agriculture Commodity Price Prediction System with Machine Learning Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 376–384, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060442
39. Hathairat Ketmaneechairat, Maleerat Maliyaem, Chalermpong Intarat, "Kamphaeng Saen Beef Cattle Identification Approach using Muzzle Print Image", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 110–122, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060413
40. Md Mahmudul Hasan, Nafiul Hasan, Dil Afroz, Ferdaus Anam Jibon, Md. Arman Hossen, Md. Shahrier Parvage, Jakaria Sulaiman Aongkon, "Electroencephalogram Based Medical Biometrics using Machine Learning: Assessment of Different Color Stimuli", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 27–34, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060304
41. Dominik Štursa, Daniel Honc, Petr Doležel, "Efficient 2D Detection and Positioning of Complex Objects for Robotic Manipulation Using Fully Convolutional Neural Network", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 915–920, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0602104
42. Md Mahmudul Hasan, Nafiul Hasan, Mohammed Saud A Alsubaie, "Development of an EEG Controlled Wheelchair Using Color Stimuli: A Machine Learning Based Approach", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 754–762, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060287
43. Antoni Wibowo, Inten Yasmina, Antoni Wibowo, "Food Price Prediction Using Time Series Linear Ridge Regression with The Best Damping Factor", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 694–698, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060280
44. Javier E. Sánchez-Galán, Fatima Rangel Barranco, Jorge Serrano Reyes, Evelyn I. Quirós-McIntire, José Ulises Jiménez, José R. Fábrega, "Using Supervised Classification Methods for the Analysis of Multi-spectral Signatures of Rice Varieties in Panama", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 552–558, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060262
45. Phillip Blunt, Bertram Haskins, "A Model for the Application of Automatic Speech Recognition for Generating Lesson Summaries", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 526–540, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060260
46. Jason Valera, Sebastian Herrera, "Design Approach of an Electric Single-Seat Vehicle with ABS and TCS for Autonomous Driving Based on Q-Learning Algorithm", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 464–471, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060253
47. Sebastianus Bara Primananda, Sani Muhamad Isa, "Forecasting Gold Price in Rupiah using Multivariate Analysis with LSTM and GRU Neural Networks", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060227
48. Hyeongjoo Kim, Sunyong Byun, "Designing and Applying a Moral Turing Test", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 93–98, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060212
49. Helen Leligou, Despina Anastasopoulos, Anita Montagna, Vassilis Solachidis, Nicholas Vretos, "Combining ICT Technologies To Serve Societal Challenges", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1319–1327, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601151
50. Byeongwoo Kim, Jongkyu Lee, "Fault Diagnosis and Noise Robustness Comparison of Rotating Machinery using CWT and CNN", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1279–1285, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601146
51. Saliha Assoul, Anass Rabii, Ounsa Roudiès, "An Operational Responsibility and Task Monitoring Method: A Data Breach Case Study", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1157–1163, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601130
52. Md Mahmudul Hasan, Nafiul Hasan, Mohammed Saud A Alsubaie, Md Mostafizur Rahman Komol, "Diagnosis of Tobacco Addiction using Medical Signal: An EEG-based Time-Frequency Domain Analysis Using Machine Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 842–849, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060193
53. Reem Bayari, Ameur Bensefia, "Text Mining Techniques for Cyberbullying Detection: State of the Art", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 783–790, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060187
54. Anass Barodi, Abderrahim Bajit, Taoufiq El Harrouti, Ahmed Tamtaoui, Mohammed Benbrahim, "An Enhanced Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach Applied to Vehicular Traffic Signs Detection and Road Safety Enhancement", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 672–683, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060173
55. Inna Valieva, Iurii Voitenko, Mats Björkman, Johan Åkerberg, Mikael Ekström, "Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms Comparison for Modulation Type Classification Based on Instantaneous Values of the Time Domain Signal and Time Series Statistics Derived from Wavelet Transform", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 658–671, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060172
56. Carlos López-Bermeo, Mauricio González-Palacio, Lina Sepúlveda-Cano, Rubén Montoya-Ramírez, César Hidalgo-Montoya, "Comparison of Machine Learning Parametric and Non-Parametric Techniques for Determining Soil Moisture: Case Study at Las Palmas Andean Basin", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 636–650, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060170
57. Ndiatenda Ndou, Ritesh Ajoodha, Ashwini Jadhav, "A Case Study to Enhance Student Support Initiatives Through Forecasting Student Success in Higher-Education", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 230–241, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060126
58. Lonia Masangu, Ashwini Jadhav, Ritesh Ajoodha, "Predicting Student Academic Performance Using Data Mining Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 153–163, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060117
59. El hadji Mbaye Ndiaye, Mactar Faye, Alphousseyni Ndiaye, "Comparative Study Between Three Methods for Optimizing the Power Produced from Photovoltaic Generator", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1458–1465, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506175
60. Sara Ftaimi, Tomader Mazri, "Handling Priority Data in Smart Transportation System by using Support Vector Machine Algorithm", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1422–1427, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506172
61. Othmane Rahmaoui, Kamal Souali, Mohammed Ouzzif, "Towards a Documents Processing Tool using Traceability Information Retrieval and Content Recognition Through Machine Learning in a Big Data Context", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1267–1277, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506151
62. Azani Cempaka Sari, Natashia Virnilia, Jasmine Tanti Susanto, Kent Anderson Phiedono, Thea Kevin Hartono, "Chatbot Developments in The Business World", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 627–635, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050676
63. Alexander Raikov, "Accelerating Decision-Making in Transport Emergency with Artificial Intelligence", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 520–530, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050662
64. Puttakul Sakul-Ung, Amornvit Vatcharaphrueksadee, Pitiporn Ruchanawet, Kanin Kearpimy, Hathairat Ketmaneechairat, Maleerat Maliyaem, "Overmind: A Collaborative Decentralized Machine Learning Framework", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 280–289, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050634
65. Meriyem Chergui, Aziza Chakir, "IT GRC Smart Adviser: Process Driven Architecture Applying an Integrated Framework", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 247–255, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050629
66. Pamela Zontone, Antonio Affanni, Riccardo Bernardini, Leonida Del Linz, Alessandro Piras, Roberto Rinaldo, "Supervised Learning Techniques for Stress Detection in Car Drivers", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 22–29, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050603
67. Kodai Kitagawa, Koji Matsumoto, Kensuke Iwanaga, Siti Anom Ahmad, Takayuki Nagasaki, Sota Nakano, Mitsumasa Hida, Shogo Okamatsu, Chikamune Wada, "Posture Recognition Method for Caregivers during Postural Change of a Patient on a Bed using Wearable Sensors", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1093–1098, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0505133
68. Zahra Jafari, Saman Rajebi, Siyamak Haghipour, "Using the Neural Network to Diagnose the Severity of Heart Disease in Patients Using General Specifications and ECG Signals Received from the Patients", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 882–892, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0505108
69. Khalid A. AlAfandy, Hicham Omara, Mohamed Lazaar, Mohammed Al Achhab, "Using Classic Networks for Classifying Remote Sensing Images: Comparative Study", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 770–780, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050594
70. Khalid A. AlAfandy, Hicham, Mohamed Lazaar, Mohammed Al Achhab, "Investment of Classic Deep CNNs and SVM for Classifying Remote Sensing Images", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 652–659, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050580
71. Rajesh Kumar, Geetha S, "Malware Classification Using XGboost-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 536–549, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050566
72. Nghia Duong-Trung, Nga Quynh Thi Tang, Xuan Son Ha, "Interpretation of Machine Learning Models for Medical Diagnosis", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 469–477, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050558
73. Mehdi Zhar, Omar Bouattane, Lhoussain Bahatti, "New Algorithm for the Development of a Musical Words Descriptor for the Artificial Composition of Oriental Music", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 434–443, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050554
74. Oumaima Terrada, Soufiane Hamida, Bouchaib Cherradi, Abdelhadi Raihani, Omar Bouattane, "Supervised Machine Learning Based Medical Diagnosis Support System for Prediction of Patients with Heart Disease", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 269–277, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050533
75. Haytham Azmi, "FPGA Acceleration of Tree-based Learning Algorithms", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 237–244, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050529
76. Hicham Moujahid, Bouchaib Cherradi, Oussama El Gannour, Lhoussain Bahatti, Oumaima Terrada, Soufiane Hamida, "Convolutional Neural Network Based Classification of Patients with Pneumonia using X-ray Lung Images", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 167–175, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050522
77. Young-Jin Park, Hui-Sup Cho, "A Method for Detecting Human Presence and Movement Using Impulse Radar", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 770–775, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050491
78. Anouar Bachar, Noureddine El Makhfi, Omar EL Bannay, "Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection Based on SVM Binary Classification Model", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 638–644, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050476
79. Adonis Santos, Patricia Angela Abu, Carlos Oppus, Rosula Reyes, "Real-Time Traffic Sign Detection and Recognition System for Assistive Driving", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 600–611, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050471
80. Amar Choudhary, Deependra Pandey, Saurabh Bhardwaj, "Overview of Solar Radiation Estimation Techniques with Development of Solar Radiation Model Using Artificial Neural Network", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 589–593, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050469
81. Maroua Abdellaoui, Dounia Daghouj, Mohammed Fattah, Younes Balboul, Said Mazer, Moulhime El Bekkali, "Artificial Intelligence Approach for Target Classification: A State of the Art", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 445–456, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050453
82. Hani AlGhanem, Mohammad Shanaa, Said Salloum, Khaled Shaalan, "The Role of KM in Enhancing AI Algorithms and Systems", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 388–396, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050445
83. Shahab Pasha, Jan Lundgren, Christian Ritz, Yuexian Zou, "Distributed Microphone Arrays, Emerging Speech and Audio Signal Processing Platforms: A Review", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 331–343, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050439
84. Ilias Kalathas, Michail Papoutsidakis, Chistos Drosos, "Optimization of the Procedures for Checking the Functionality of the Greek Railways: Data Mining and Machine Learning Approach to Predict Passenger Train Immobilization", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 287–295, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050435
85. Yosaphat Catur Widiyono, Sani Muhamad Isa, "Utilization of Data Mining to Predict Non-Performing Loan", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 252–256, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050431
86. Hai Thanh Nguyen, Nhi Yen Kim Phan, Huong Hoang Luong, Trung Phuoc Le, Nghi Cong Tran, "Efficient Discretization Approaches for Machine Learning Techniques to Improve Disease Classification on Gut Microbiome Composition Data", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 547–556, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050368
87. Ruba Obiedat, "Risk Management: The Case of Intrusion Detection using Data Mining Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 529–535, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050365
88. Mainar Swari Mahardika, Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, Putu Agya Paramartha, Louis Dwysevrey Ompusunggu, Rahmatul Mahdalina, Farid Affan, "Measurement of Employee Awareness Levels for Information Security at the Center of Analysis and Information Services Judicial Commission Republic of Indonesia", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 501–509, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050362
89. Krina B. Gabani, Mayuri A. Mehta, Stephanie Noronha, "Racial Categorization Methods: A Survey", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 388–401, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050350
90. Efrain Mendez, German Baltazar-Reyes, Israel Macias, Adriana Vargas-Martinez, Jorge de Jesus Lozoya-Santos, Ricardo Ramirez-Mendoza, Ruben Morales-Menendez and Arturo Molina, "ANN Based MRAC-PID Controller Implementation for a Furuta Pendulum System Stabilization", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 324–333, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050342
91. Dennis Luqman, Sani Muhamad Isa, "Machine Learning Model to Identify the Optimum Database Query Execution Platform on GPU Assisted Database", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 214–225, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050328
92. Neptali Montañez, Jomari Joseph Barrera, "Automated Abaca Fiber Grade Classification Using Convolution Neural Network (CNN)", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 207–213, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050327
93. Gillala Rekha, Shaveta Malik, Amit Kumar Tyagi, Meghna Manoj Nair, "Intrusion Detection in Cyber Security: Role of Machine Learning and Data Mining in Cyber Security", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 72–81, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050310
94. Rabeb Faleh, Souhir Bedoui, Abdennaceur Kachouri, "Review on Smart Electronic Nose Coupled with Artificial Intelligence for Air Quality Monitoring", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 739–747, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050292
95. Ahmed EL Orche, Mohamed Bahaj, "Approach to Combine an Ontology-Based on Payment System with Neural Network for Transaction Fraud Detection", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 551–560, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050269
96. Bokyoon Na, Geoffrey C Fox, "Object Classifications by Image Super-Resolution Preprocessing for Convolutional Neural Networks", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 476–483, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050261
97. Gredion Prajena, Jeklin Harefa, Andry Chowanda, Alexander, Maskat, Kamal Rahman, Muhammad Naufal Fadhil, "The Adventure of BipBop: An Android App Pathfinding Adventure Game", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 299–304, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050239
98. Johannes Linden, Xutao Wang, Stefan Forsstrom, Tingting Zhang, "Productify News Article Classification Model with Sagemaker", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 13–18, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050202
99. Michael Wenceslaus Putong, Suharjito, "Classification Model of Contact Center Customers Emails Using Machine Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 174–182, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050123
100. Rehan Ullah Khan, Ali Mustafa Qamar, Mohammed Hadwan, "Quranic Reciter Recognition: A Machine Learning Approach", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 173–176, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040621