1. Introduction

Nowadays, the population of old people has rapidly increased around the world. The rapid increase of seniors may cause large negative impacts to the societies in many countries, if they have unhealthy lives. World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that the physical health determines the Quality of Life (QoL) of a human [2]. To achieve the stability and prosperity of the country, it is one of the most important policies for many countries to advance the QoL and health of the people including seniors.

However, a lot of seniors are in unhealthy conditions, may stay at home all the time, and do never have exercises. Before this study, we had interviews 20 seniors in Indonesia, and found that about 50% of them are suffering from pains in the bodies. More specifically, five seniors feel pains on their legs, three seniors on the backs, and two seniors on the shoulders. Nevertheless, our survey found that in one week on average, three seniors have exercises at more than three times, one has three times, two have two times, and six have one time. The remaining seniors have no exercise at all. Only 15% of them have regular exercises outside their homes more than three times a week to alleviate pains.

Besides, pandemic spreads of COVID-19 force people to stay at home in order to avoid infections among them [3]. Then, many people have lost opportunities of having regular exercises in daily lives, such as walking to offices, schools, or shopping centers, and enjoying sports or trainings in outdoors, fields, or gyms. The similar situations to seniors may also cause health problems to a lot of people around the world.

In this paper, we propose an Exercise and Performance Learning Assistant System (EPLAS) to assist people practicing exercises or learning performances by themselves at home. EPLAS offers a video content showing the model movement of an instructor for some exercise or performance such as Yoga, Tai Chi, or dance. The user should follow the actions suggested by the instructor as similarly as possible. In EPLAS, the rating function is implemented to rate the user reaction to each action of the instructor. It calculates the difference between the coordinates of the feature points in the image of the instructor and in that of the user. If the difference is small, the function gives the higher rate, since both actions are similar.

The feature points are actually extracted by applying OpenPose [4] to the corresponding images of the instructor

and the user to each action. OpenPose is a popular opensource program for real-time human pose estimation, and has been developed by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University. It can estimate the poses of multiple persons in one image at the same time. First, OpenPose detects the feature points called keypoints of every person in the image. Then, it allocates them to distinct individuals in the image. The source codes and documents can be accessed at GitHub.

For evaluations of the proposal, we prepared videos of five simple Yoga poses, and asked 41 persons in Indonesia, Japan, and Taiwan to practice the Yoga poses using EPLAS. Then, we asked 20 persons including the Yoga instructor to evaluate each pose of every participant subjectively. The results show the strong correlation exists between the subjective evaluation results and the rating function outputs in EPLAS. The rating function also points out the feature points to be improved in each pose. Thus, the effectiveness of the proposal is confirmed.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 explores relevant studies in literature. Section 3 presents the overview of EPLAS Section 4 presents the rating function in EPLAS. Section 5 shows evaluation results of EPLAS. Finally, Section 6 concludes this paper with future works.

2. Related Works in Literature

In this section, we discuss related works to this paper in literature. Some of the papers focus on evaluating physical exercises for seniors using robot interactions or electrical muscles, and on helping seniors to record the personal health with the physical health record such as Fuzzy System, Exergames.

In [5], the author proposed a unique fuzzy system design for adjusting the cycle ergometer workload to the physical work capacity of the individual, and observed the physical work capacity by measuring the heart rate and the muscularfatigue-related index. A set of fuzzy membership functions were adopted for three different phases during a trial exercise with a progressively increasing workload.

In [6], the author presented the design, implementation, and user study evaluation of a socially assistive robot (SAR) system, which has been designed to engage elderly users in physical exercises aimed at achieving health benefits and improving the quality of life (QoL).

In [7], the author showed a moderate therapeutic effect associated with the self-application of the neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) application protocol that targets improvements in the muscle strength and the cardiovascular exercise capacity of an elderly person. This work is the promising first step towards the development of an NMES application protocol that could eventually be widely used by seniors to counteract the detrimental effects of aging.

In [8], the author proposed a study for understanding why seniors still perceive the usability of Personal Health Records as low in spite of the publicly available guidelines. Personal Health Records focuses on user generated contents where health websites provide information for users to consume.

In [9], the author proposed the design, implementation, wide deployment, and evaluation of the low-cost physical exercise and gaming (exergaming) FitForAll (FFA) platform. The system usability, the user adherence to exercise, and the efficacy are explored. The design of FFA is tailored to elderly people, distilling literature guidelines and recommendations. The FFA architecture introduces standard physical exercise protocols in exergaming software engineering, as well as, standard physical assessment tests for the augmented adaptability through the adjustable exercise intensity.

In [10], the author developed an exercise-management platform with an end-user application software and a connective sport device to collect and store the elderly individual’s exercise data as a reference for diagnosis and treatments. Compared to traditional methods for encouraging sports, this platform uses Near Field Communication (NFC) for automatically collecting data.

In [11], the author studied the correlation between the sense of presence and the attitude towards physical exercises in an active game-based exercise training program for older adults. The hypothesis in this study is that the more positive attitude towards physical exercises would lead to a higher sense of presence. There is the significant positive correlation between them in this program.

In [12], the author supported the positive effects of exergaming playing on the elderly’s attitude towards exergames, psychosocial well-being (sociability and loneliness), and inter-generational perceptions. Exergames could be used as a good intervention to improve social interactions among the elderly and promote the healthy and active ageing. Senior Activity Centres (SAC) may introduce exergames and organize it as a weekly activity. Policymakers can use exergames to create an environment for elderly to take physical exercises, maintain social relationships, and in turn, improve the elderly’s psychosocial well-being.

In [13], the author developed a sensor resistance-band for objective exercise measurements and preliminary trials of activities’ classifications by using the artificial intelligence. The preliminary experiments show that the sensor resistanceband can be used as the replacement equipment of the traditional resistance-band in handling for data collections. A future study will be based on the sensed resistance-band to quantify the exercises objectively in elderly people.

In [14], the author presented a design of Embedded based Assistive System for Yoga (EASY) and its implementation for

Yoga postures analysis, using Kinect and LabVIEW. The authors claimed that the novelty of the proposal is the integration of the skeleton method and the golden template techniques to identify the amount of deviation while performing the asana postures. However, there is no detail on how to extract the skeletons accurately, and also no detail on what is the golden template method.

In [15], the author presented a Yoga pose evaluation method using OpenPose. This method calculates the angle of the human pose at the important feature point, including the elbow and the knee, using the to-and-fro feature points together, and compares the angle of the instructor pose and that of the user pose.

3. Proposal of EPLAS

In this section, we propose the Exercise and Performance Learning Assistant System (EPLAS) to help people to practice exercises and learn performances by themselves at home.

3.1. Required Devices

In EPLAS, a personal computer (PC) displays a video on the monitor and rates the user reaction. The PC camera should be installed to capture the motion of the user. For more realistic instructions, a flat wall in the room can be used as the monitor by adopting a projector. The wireless mouse will be used to control the PC by the user, because the user needs to stay at a distance place from the PC so that the PC camera can detect the whole body of the user. Depending on the exercise, the user may sit on a chair during the exercise.

Table shows the specifications of the adopted PC. A high-performance computer that has a lot of GPUs will be necessary to evaluate dynamic movements of poses using OpenPose, which will be in future studies.

Table 1: Specifications of PC.

To reduce the cost, an inexpensive computing device such as Raspberry Pi [16] can be used instead of the PC. In this case, a webcam, a monitor, and a keyboard are additionally required because Raspberry Pi does not contain them.

3.2. Implemented Functions

For efficient self-practices by users, EPLAS provides the following functions:

1. Content selection function
   • user can select and start the video of the exercise orperformance to be practiced.
2. Mirror function
   • user can view the movement or reaction of him-self/herself on the monitor to each action of the instructor during the practice.
3. Rating function
   • user can know the accuracy of his/her reaction to each action of the instructor.

3.3. Utilization Procedure

The user can use EPLAS for the self-practice by the following procedure:

1. Set up the necessary devices for EPLAS at home properly. Put it in front of the user. Here, it is necessary to make sure that the whole body of the user is detected by the camera.
2. Start running the EPLAS software.
3. Sit on a chair if necessary.
4. Select and run one video content at EPLAS.
5. Practice the exercise or performance by following the movements of the instructor in the video.
6. Reflect the practice by the result of the rating function.

3.4. EPLAS User Interface

For the trial use of EPLAS, we implemented simple user interface functions that run only on Chrome [17] browser. Chrome offers rich functions and is now very popular around the world. When the interface is opened, the EPLAS menu in Figure 1 appears. It displays the five yoga poses that are available currently. There are Mountain Pose, Side Bend Pose, Warrior Pose, Seated 1 Pose and Seated 2 Pose. Then, the user chooses one of them and start the exercise.

Figure 1: Menu interface.

When one of the yoga pose is chosen, the corresponding exercise interface in Figure 2 appears. This interface has three views.

The left top view displays the current movement or reaction of the user for the mirror function. This camera display function is realized using the built-in camera function in Chrome. Thus, the request for the camera access permission pops up automatically. By permitting it, the moving image of the camera appears there. The moving image can be recorded on the browser, if necessary.

The right top view displays the video of the exercise or performance by an instructor. By imitating the movements of the instructor in this view, the user can practice or enjoy the exercise or performance learning.

The left bottom view displays the recorded moving image of the user. By clicking the button, the user can see his/her movement or reaction for the instructor video. The recorded moving image will be used in the rating function in the next section.

Figure 2: Exercise interface.

4. Rating Function

In this section, we present the rating function using Open-

Pose to give a numerical feedback on the quality of movements or poses of the user in an exercise or a performance.

4.1. Idea in Rating Function

From a photo or a video frame containing a human body, OpenPose can extract the coordinates of the 18 feature points of the body on the coordinate system of the photo/frame, called keypoints. Figure 3 illustrates the feature points for determining a human pose. Here, we note that OpenPose can handle multiple human bodies in the same photo/frame at the same time. Then, we consider that the difference of the coordinates between the instructor pose and the user pose for the same action is a proper index to evaluate the accuracy of the user reaction.

Figure 3: 18 feature points by OpenPose.

4.2. Coordinate System Adjustment

However, the coordinate systems of two photos/frames can be different by the camera architecture or the distance between the subject and the camera. Since the instructor photo/video should be taken beforehand at a different place using a different camera, the coordinate system for the user pose must be adjusted to be coincident with that for the instructor pose as much as possible.

In this paper, we adjust the x-coordinate and the ycoordinate of the feature points through the liner functions, x⁰ = a_xx + b_x, y⁰ = a_yy + b_y, independently. The values of the coefficients, a_x,b_x,a_y, and b_y, are obtained by applying the least-squares method to the x-coordinates or the y-coordinates of the 18 feature points to minimize the difference between the instructor pose and the user pose, respectively.

4.3. Feature Point Pickup for Improvements

On a feature point of the user pose, if the corresponding coordinate is much different from that of the instructor pose, the user should care the point intensively to improve the whole pose or reaction. In this paper, we calculate the Euclid distance between the user/instructor coordinates for every feature point, and take the average and the standard deviation of the Euclid distances for all the points. Then, we choose the summation of the average and the standard deviation for the threshold, and pick up the feature points whose Euclid distance is larger than this threshold. In other words, we regard the 16% of the instances as abnormal, assuming they follow the normal distribution.

4.4. Procedure

Now, we present the procedure of the rating function for one pose. When multiple poses are rated, this procedure should be repeated for them.

1. Select the photo or capture the video frame that contains the pose to be rated. Here, the final pose to be rated is often longer that the other transition poses.
2. Run OpenPose and extract the coordinates of the 18 feature points.
3. Repeat these steps for both the instructor photo/video and the user photo/video.
4. Apply the least squares method to the x-coordinates and the y-coordinates of the feature points to minimize the difference between the instructor photo/frame and the user one.
5. Adjust the x- and y-coordinates of the feature points for the user pose by using the linear functions.
6. Calculate the Euclid distance between the two coordinates corresponding to each feature point after the adjustments.
7. Calculate the average and the standard deviation of the Euclid distances to the 18 feature points.
8. Take the summation of the average and the standard deviation as the threshold.
9. Pick up any feature point of the user pose if the Euclid distance is larger than both this threshold and the minimum threshold, and notice it to the user to be improved. Here, the minimum threshold should be selected properly.

To avoid pointing too many feature points to be improved, we select the points whose Euclid distance is larger than both the calculated threshold and the minimum threshold. If no feature point is selected for a pose, we select the point whose Euclid distance is the largest among the points in the pose, so that the user can know which part should be improved. For the minimum threshold, we choose the average threshold among the 41 persons in this paper. In future studies, the minimum threshold will be tuned into the proper value. In both figures, we mark the selected feature points.

4.5. Advantages of Proposal

The rating function of the proposal is applied to the important static postures of each Yoga pose where the user keeps the same body state for a while. The Euclid distances of the coordinates of the feature points found by OpenPose between the instructor and the user are calculated. Then, the correctness of the Yoga pose is evaluated at every feature point by comparing the distance with the threshold that is given by the summation of the average Euclid distance among all the feature points and its standard deviation. If the distance is larger than the threshold, the function feedbacks that the corresponding point should be improved. Thus, the proposal points out the individual feature points to be improved for the user.

Besides, the proposal gives the overall evaluation of the whole posture of the user. The larger threshold suggests the worse pose, since it becomes larger when the difference between the user’s pose and the instructor’s pose is large. By comparing the thresholds between the users, the best/worst users and their Yoga poses can be known. Furthermore, by reviewing the past thresholds, the user can know his/her improvements, which will be in future works.

5. Evaluations

In this section, we evaluate the proposed EPLAS using five Yoga poses and the rating function through application to 41 persons in Indonesia, Japan, Myanmar, and Taiwan. We evaluate the user pose by objective evaluation using OpenPose by comparing the result of keypoint and JSON fie between the instructor Pose and the User Pose. Then we made a form subjective evalulation by scoring the instructor and 19 corespondence.

5.1. Evaluation Setup

For evaluations, we adopted the conventional personal computer (PC) in Table , because only the static postures are evaluated in the current system. It is noted that high-performance computer that has a lot of GPUs will be necessary to evaluate dynamic movements of poses using OpenPose, which will be in future studies.

Then, we prepared the videos for five Yoga poses in Figure 4, and asked 41 persons in Indonesia, Japan, Myanmar and Taiwan with various ages, to practice them by following the movements of the instructor as the EPLAS users. Then, we manually selected the frames for the final poses by the instructor and the users from the recorded videos, where the final pose stopped for several seconds. By following the procedure in Section 4, we calculated the threshold for each Yoga pose of every user. The correctness of the static posture of the Yoga pose is evaluated at every feature point in our proposal. For the static posture, we calculate the threshold by taking the summation of the average Euclid distance among all the feature points between the instructor and the user and its standard deviation, and compare the Euclid distance at every feature point with this threshold. If the distance is larger than the threshold, our system feedbacks to the user that the corresponding feature point should especially be improved for the better static posture, among the feature points. The larger threshold suggests the worse pose, since the threshold becomes larger when the difference between the user’s pose and the instructor’s pose is large. By comparing the thresholds between users, a user can know who shows the good performance and who does the bad one. Also, by reviewing the recorded thresholds, the user can know the improvements of the performance

Figure 4: Five Yoga poses by instructor.

Then, for the subjective evaluation, we requested the Yoga instructor in the videos and 19 users among the 41 users, to rate each pose of every user in the experiments with three points by showing the instructor’s photo and the user’s photo. The goodness of a Yoga pose can be subjective. In this rating, we asked them to rate 1 if they feel the pose in the photo is good, 2 if they feel it is neutral, and 3 if they feel it is bad. Then, we calculated the subjective results and comparing the subjective result with our system results.

5.2. Results for Individual Users

First, we discuss the evaluation results for individual users.

Table 2 shows the rating results by the proposal and the subjective evaluation results for individual users. For each one of the 41 users in the experiments, this table presents the gender, the age, the average of the average Euclid distances among the 18 feature points for the five Yoga poses, the average of the standard deviations (SD) of the Euclid distances for the five poses, the average of the thresholds (TH), and the average of the total subjective rating results for the five poses among 41 users.

Then, to confirm the validity of the proposed rating function, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the average thresholds and the average rating results among the 41 users. The value is 0.746, which suggests the strong correlation exists between them. Actually, the two graphs in Figure 5 suggest the similarity between the average thresholds and the subjective rating results of the 41 users.

Figure 5: Average thresholds and rating results of 41 users.

When the average thresholds are compared among the users, younger users have smaller thresholds than older users, in general. As mentioned before, the threshold is given by the summation of the average and the standard deviation of the Euclid distances. The correlation coefficient between the age and the average threshold is 0.660, and that between the age and the average rating result is 0.628. Both suggest the moderate correlations.

Table 2: Application results of 41 users.

5.3. Results for Five Poses

Next, we discuss the evaluation results for individual poses. Table 3 compares the average thresholds between the five poses. It indicates that Seated 2 exhibits the largest threshold (31.85), while Side-bend does the smallest threshold (12.41). As illustrated in Figure 4 (e), to stretch the left arm and bend it deeply at Seated 2 may be difficult for seniors, which makes the threshold large.

Table 3: Comparisons of average thresholds among five poses.

5.4. Discussions of User Poses with Smallest and Largest Thresholds

Among the 41 users, the 26-year lady at ID-40 exhibits the smallest average threshold (14.23 = 8.9 + 5.04) and the 68-year lady at ID-3 does the largest average threshold (32.04 = 20.03 + 12.01). Figures 6 and 7 show their poses for Side-bend and Seated 2. Clearly, the difference of the performance quality can be noticed between their poses.

In these figures, the feature points that should be improved are pointed out by the marked crosses for further improvements of the poses. They are extracted in the rating function, where the Euclid distances are larger than the thresholds. Here, the average threshold value among the 41 users in Table 3 is used for the minimum threshold.

In Figure 6 (a), the right hand is pointed, because it is not stretched sufficiently, if compared with the instructor in Figure 4 (b). In Figure 6 (b), the three points in the both hands are pointed out, where the both arms should be stretched. It is noted that due to the pain, this lady cannot stretch the arms. Besides, the left leg is also pointed out, because the both legs are not parallel. In Figure 7 (a), the right leg is pointed, because the both legs are not parallel. In Figure 7 (b), the left hand is pointed out, where the left arm should be stretched and bended to the right side. Besides, the left leg is pointed out, because the both legs are not parallel. It is expected that the users will improve their poses by caring these feature points.

Figure 6: Comparison of Side-bend poses.

Figure 7: Comparison of Seated 2 poses.

6. Conclusion

This paper proposed the Exercise and Performance Learning Assistant System (EPLAS) to assist people practicing exercises or learning performances by themselves at home. Using an open-source software OpenPose, the rating function was implemented to evaluate the user pose and point out the feature points to be improved. For evaluations, the instructor videos of five Yoga poses were prepared, and EPLAS was applied to 41 persons with various ages and genders in Indonesia, Japan, and Taiwan. The quality of the poses was also subjectively evaluated by 20 persons, where the strong correlation was observed between the subjective results and the rating function outputs. Besides, EPLAS pointed out the feature points to be improved in each pose. Thus, the effectiveness of the proposal was confirmed. In future works, we will improve user interfaces for easy operations by seniors, collect a variety of exercise/performance video contents, evolve the rating function for evaluating dynamic motions, and apply EPLAS to more various people for evaluations.

1. I. T. Anggraini, A. Basuki, and N. Funabiki, “A proposal of entertain- ment and performance learning assistant system for seniors,” in Proc. Int. Elec. Symp. (IES), 14-18, 2019.
2. https://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/ whoqol/en/.
3. https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab= tab_1.
4. https://github.com/CMU-Perceptual-Computing-Lab/ openpose.
5. T. Kiryu, I. Sasaki, K. Shibai and K. Tanaka, ”Providing appropriate exercise levels for the elderly,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., 20(6), 116-124, 2001.
6. J. Fasola and M.J Mataric ”Using socially assistive human–robot in- teraction to motivate physical exercise for older adults,” Proc. IEEE, 100(8), 2512-2526, 2012.
7. B. Caulfield, A. Prendergast, G. Rainsford, and C. Minogue, ”Self directed home based electrical muscle stimulation training improves exercise tolerance and strength in healthy elderly,” in Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBS), 7036-7039. 2013.
8. S. Ogunseye, S. X.Y. Komiak, and P. Komiak, ”The impact of senior- friendliness guidelines on seniors’ use of personal health records,” in
   h. Inform. (ICHI), 597-602, 2015.
9. E. I. Konstantinidis, A. S. Billis, C. A. Mouzakidis, V. I. Zilidou, P.E. Antoniou, and P. D. Bamidis, ”Design, implementation and wide pilot deployment of FitForAll: an easy to use exergaming platform improving physical fitness and life quality of senior citizens,” IEEE J. Bio. Health Inform., 20(1), 189-200, 2016.
10. H. Wu, K.-Y. Lin, P. Liu, T. Hung, Z. Xiao, J. Chen, R. Lai, W. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. Ye, ”Development of an exercise management platform for the elderly,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Cons. Elect. Taiwan (ICCE-TW), 399-400, 2017.
11. A. M. Campelo and L. Katz, “Physical literacy promotion in older adults using active video gaming: a sense of presence and attitudes towards exercise,” in Proc. IEEE Game., Enter., Media Conf. (GEM), 163-166, 2018.
12. C. Li, J. Li, T. P. Pham, and Y. Theng, ”Promoting healthy and active ageing through exergames: effects of exergames on senior adults’ psychosocial well-being,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Cyberworld., 288-291, 2018.
13. J. Ma, E. Hogervorst, D. Magistro, V. Chouliaras, and M. Zecca ”Development of sensorised resistance band for objective exercise measurement: activities classification trial,” in Proc. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBS), 3942-3945, July 2018.
14. M. C. Chinnaiah, T. P. Kausalya Nandan, P. Haritha, S. Dubey, and I. Pasha, ”A new deliberation of embedded based assistive system for Yoga,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Embed. Comput. Syst. Design (ISED), 42-47, 2018.
15. M. C. Thar, K. Win, and N. Funabiki “A proposal of Yoga pose as- sessment method using pose detection for self-learning,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Inform. Tech. (ICAIT), 137-142, 2019.
16. https://www.raspberrypi.org/.
17. Chrome Browser, https://www.chrome.com

Citations by Dimensions

Citations by PlumX

Google Scholar

Crossref Citations

1. Izuchukwu Francis Okafor, Mustapha Abdullahi, Bappah Adamu Umar, Kelechi U. Adie, "Investigating the Influence Biomass Additive on the Thermal Performance of a Fired-Clay for Producing the Inner Liner of a Biomass Cook-Stove", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2026. doi: 10.25046/aj110107
2. Fahmina Taranum, Sadaf Kauser, Maniza Hijab, Gouri R Patil, Syeda Fouzia Sayeedunissa, "Beyond Fitness: Revolutionary Exercise Tracker Combining Pose Recognition with Heart Rate Monitoring using Remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG)", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 2026. doi: 10.25046/aj110104
3. Marlene Böhmer, Thorsten Herfet, "PerfVis+: From Timestamps to Insight through Integration of Visual and Statistical Analysis", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 77–87, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100607
4. Glender Brás, Samara Leal, Breno Sousa, Gabriel Paes, Cleberson Junior, João Souza, Rafael Assis, Tamires Marques, Thiago Teles Calazans Silva, "Machine Learning Methods for University Student Performance Prediction in Basic Skills based on Psychometric Profile", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100401
5. Fadwa Bouhannana, Akram El Korchi, "Application of Lean Practices in Food Supply Chain: The Case of Morocco", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 101–110, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080412
6. Joaquín Pérez Balbela, Aruna Prem Bianzino, "Indoor Positioning: Comparing Different Techniques and Dealing with a user Authentication use Case", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 40–47, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080305
7. Temsamani Khallouk Yassine, Achchab Said, Laouami Lamia, Faridi Mohammed, "Hybrid Discriminant Neural Networks for Performance Job Prediction", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 116–122, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080213
8. Ossama Embarak, "Multi-Layered Machine Learning Model For Mining Learners Academic Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 850–861, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060194
9. Emily Holt, Casey Corrado, "Emerging Trends in Green Best Practices and the Impact on Government Policy", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 212–221, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070623
10. Angela Pearce, "The Perceptions of Students and Teachers When using ICTs for Educational Practices Matter: A Systematic Review", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1–12, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070601
11. Heidi Fleischer, Sascha Statkevych, Janne Widmer, Regina Stoll, Thomas Roddelkopf, Kerstin Thurow, "Automated Robotic System for Sample Preparation and Measurement of Heavy Metals in Indoor Dust Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 139–151, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070316
12. Kaito Echizenya, Kazuhiro Kondo, "Indoor Position and Movement Direction Estimation System Using DNN on BLE Beacon RSSI Fingerprints", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 129–138, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070315
13. Aicha Lamjahdi, Hafida Bouloiz, Maryam Gallab, "Heuristic Analysis of Overall Performance Measurement Perception and Management in Automotive Industry", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070301
14. Boris Kontsevoi, Sergei Terekhov, "TETRA™ Techniques to Assess and Manage the Software Technical Debt", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 303–309, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060534
15. Maroua Barha, Soumaia Hmimou, Mounir Ait Kerroum, Hamid Ait Lemqeddem, "The Internal Reliability of a Questionnaire on the Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning on the Performance of Moroccan Companies", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 59–64, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060508
16. Radwan Qasrawi, Stephanny VicunaPolo, Diala Abu Al-Halawa, Sameh Hallaq, Ziad Abdeen, "Predicting School Children Academic Performance Using Machine Learning Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 08–15, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060502
17. Rafael Souza Cotrim, João Manuel Leitão Pires Caldeira, Vasco Nuno da Gama de Jesus Soares, Pedro Miguel de Figueiredo Dinis Oliveira Gaspar, "Power Saving MAC Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Performance Assessment Analysis", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 341–347, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060438
18. Juanita Juanita, Titus Hari Setiawan, Anwar Ma’ruf, "The Operational Performance of Mass Transportation Before Covid-19 and New Normal Life: Case Study BRT TransJateng, Central Java", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 361–366, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060342
19. Abderrahmane Ouddasser, Anass Mellouki, Yassine Belyagou, Kamal Yazzif, "The health Sector Between Innovation and Organizational Performance: Applied Research in Moroccan Hospitals", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 277–285, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060331
20. Md Mahmudul Hasan, Nafiul Hasan, Dil Afroz, Ferdaus Anam Jibon, Md. Arman Hossen, Md. Shahrier Parvage, Jakaria Sulaiman Aongkon, "Electroencephalogram Based Medical Biometrics using Machine Learning: Assessment of Different Color Stimuli", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 27–34, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060304
21. Marlene Ofelia Sanchez-Escobar, Julieta Noguez, Jose Martin Molina-Espinosa, Rafael Lozano-Espinosa, "Supporting the Management of Predictive Analytics Projects in a Decision-Making Center using Process Mining", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1084–1090, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0602123
22. Zvanaka S. Mazhandu, Edison Muzenda, Mohamed Belaid, Tirivaviri A. Mamvura, Trust Nhubu, "A Review of Plastic Waste Management Practices: What Can South Africa Learn?", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1013–1028, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0602116
23. Amany Khalil, Osama Tolba, Sherif Ezzeldin, "Design Optimization of Open Office Building Form for Thermal Energy Performance using Genetic Algorithm", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 254–261, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060228
24. Futra Zamsyah Md Fadzil, Alireza Mousavi, Morad Danishvar, "Event Modeller Data Analytic for Harmonic Failures", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1343–1359, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601154
25. Ayodele Periola, Akintunde Alonge, Kingsley Ogudo, "Underwater Computing Systems and Astronomy–Multi-Disciplinary Research Potential and Benefits", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1000–1011, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601111
26. Abdulla Alsharhan, Said Salloum, Khaled Shaalan, "The Impact of eLearning as a Knowledge Management Tool in Organizational Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 928–936, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601102
27. Desman Hidayat, Edi Abdurachman, Elidjen, Yanthi Hutagaol, "The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Knowledge Creation-Firm Performance Nexus: Evidence from Indonesian IT Companies", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 922–927, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601101
28. Lesia Marushchak, Olha Pavlykivska, Galyna Liakhovych, Oksana Vakun, Nataliia Shveda, "Accounting Software in Modern Business", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 862–870, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060195
29. Deddy Kurniawan, Ditdit Nugeraha Utama, "Decision Support Model using FIM Sugeno for Assessing the Academic Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 605–611, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060165
30. Amin S. Ibrahim, Khaled Y Youssef, Mohamed Abouelatta, "Traffic Aggregation Techniques for Optimizing IoT Networks", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 509–518, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060156
31. Najat Messaoudi, Jaafar Khalid Naciri, Bahloul Bensassi, "Mathematical Modelling of Output Responses and Performance Variations of an Education System due to Changes in Input Parameters", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 327–335, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060137
32. Dionisius Saviordo Thenuardi, Benfano Soewito, "Indoor Positioning System using WKNN and LSTM Combined via Ensemble Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 242–249, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060127
33. Ndiatenda Ndou, Ritesh Ajoodha, Ashwini Jadhav, "A Case Study to Enhance Student Support Initiatives Through Forecasting Student Success in Higher-Education", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 230–241, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060126
34. Walter Cervera-Flores, Yenifer Choque-Garibay, Nahuel Gonzalez-Cordero, Brian Meneses-Claudio, Hernan Solis-Matta, Lourdes Matta-Zamudio, "Level of Empathy in Nursing Students Attending Clinical Practices of the Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 178–183, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060120
35. Yanet Cruz Flores, Tania Retuerto-Azaña, Jaquelin Nuñez-Artica, Brian Meneses-Claudio, Hernan Matta Solis, Lourdes Matta-Zamudio, "Lifestyle in Nursing Students at a University of North Lima", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 164–168, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060118
36. Lonia Masangu, Ashwini Jadhav, Ritesh Ajoodha, "Predicting Student Academic Performance Using Data Mining Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 153–163, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060117
37. Mahmut Demirtas, Kerem C ̧ agdas ̧ Durmus ̧, Gülçín Tanıs ̧, Caner Arslan, Metin Balcı, "Downlink Indoor Coverage Performance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle LTE Base Stations", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 128–133, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060114
38. Nin Hayati Mohd Yusoff, Nurul Azma Zakaria, "Development and Performance Analysis of HRPL Using 6LoWPAN CC2538 Module for IoT Ecosystem", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1217–1224, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506145
39. Rewan Kumar Dahal, Ganesh Bhattarai, Dipendra Karki, "Determinants of Technological and Innovation Performance of the Nepalese Cellular Telecommunications Industry from the Customers’ Perspective", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1013–1020, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506122
40. Mohammed Hadwan, Rehan Uallah Khan, Khalil Ibrahim Mohammad Abuzanouneh, "Towards a Smart Campus for Qassim University: An Investigation of Indoor Navigation System", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 831–837, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050699
41. Ignacio Alvarez-Placencia, Diana Sánchez-Partida, Patricia Cano-Olivos, José-Luis Martínez-Flores, "Inventory Management Practices during COVID 19 Pandemic to Maintain Liquidity Increasing Customer Service level in an Industrial Products Company in Mexico", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 613–626, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050675
42. Kamal Jaiswal, Serdar Dalkilic, Evangelos Papageorgiou, Balgopal Singh, "Aviation MRO: Impact of Physical Environment Factors on Job Performance in Aircraft Maintenance Organization", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 148–154, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050617
43. Klyagin Viktor Anatolievich, Laushin Dmitry Andreevich, "The Impact Assessment of the Errors in Determining the Mass and Zero Lift-Drag Coefficient on the Aircraft’s Performance Data", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 118–126, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050613
44. Faizan Dastgeer, Hasan Erteza Gelani, "Renewable Electric Power from the Equine Treadmill: An Evaluation of the Potential", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 997–1006, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0505122
45. Thi Anh Van Nguyen, Khac Hieu Nguyen, "The Impact of Innovation on the Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises in Vietnam", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 984–990, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0505120
46. Fayza A. Nada, "Performance Analysis of Selective Repeat ARQ Protocol Used in Digital Data Transmission Over Unreliable Channels", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 927–933, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0505113
47. Tri Nhut Do, Quang Minh Pham, Hoa Binh Le-Nguyen, Cao Tri Nguyen, Hai Minh Nguyen-Tran, "Development of a Wireless Displacement Estimation System Using IMU-based Device", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 781–788, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050595
48. Mika Karjalainen, Tero Kokkonen, "Review of Pedagogical Principles of Cyber Security Exercises", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 592–600, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050572
49. Aziza Chakir, Meriyem Chergui, Johanes Fernandes Andry, "A Smart Updater IT Governance Platform Based on Artificial Intelligence", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 47–53, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050507
50. Sanaz Gheibi, Tania Banerjee, Sanjay Ranka, Sartaj Sahni, "Fine Tuning the Performance of Parallel Codes", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 824–840, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050497
51. Supalak Sathiracheewin, Patamaporn Sripadungtham, Settakorn Kamuang, "Performance Analysis of Grid-Connected PV Rooftop, at Sakon Nakhon Province, Thailand", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 816–823, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050496
52. Fayza Ahmed Nada, "Performance Analysis of Go-Back-N ARQ Protocol Used in Data Transmission Over Noisy Channels", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 612–617, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050472
53. Pratik Kumar Singh, Fadillah Binti Ismail, Chan Shiau Wei, Muhammad Imran, Syed Ashfaq Ahmed, "A Framework of E-Procurement Technology for Sustainable Procurement in ISO 14001 Certified Firms in Malaysia", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 424–431, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050450
54. Rafidah Abd Karim, Airil Haimi Mohd Adnan, Mohd Haniff Mohd Tahir, Mohd Hafiz Mat Adam, Noorzaina Idris, Izwah Ismail, "The Application of Mobile Learning Technologies at Malaysian Universities Through Mind Mapping Apps for Augmenting Writing Performance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 510–517, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050363
55. Md. Imdadul Hoque, Abul kalam Azad, Mohammad Abu Hurayra Tuhin, Zayed Us Salehin, "University Students Result Analysis and Prediction System by Decision Tree Algorithm", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 115–122, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050315
56. Gede Indrawan, I Made Agus Oka Gunawan, Sariyasa, "The Usability Evaluation of Academic Progress Information System (SIsKA-NG)", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 460–468, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050259
57. Arthur James Swart, Pierre Eduard Hertzog, "Promoting Continuous Professional Development Among Academics from A Vocational College by Using A Practical Workshop Based on Arduino Technology", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 452–459, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050258
58. Jorge Castro-Bedriñana, Doris Chirinos-Peinado, Felipe Zenteno-Vigo, Gianfranco Castro-Chirinos, "Satisfaction of Old Graduates of Zootechnical Engineering for Improvement of Educational Quality at the UNCP", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 166–173, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050221
59. Dora Yvonne Arce Santillan, Omar Freddy Chamorro Atalaya, Yesica Pamela Leandro Chacón, Jorge Isaac Castro Bedriñana, Elizabeth Rosario Martínez Santillán, "The Proportionality of Women Graduated from the Professional Career of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering at UNTELS: Analysis of their Academic Performance and Labor Field of Action", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 368–372, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050147
60. Vladyslav Kucher, Jens Hunloh, Sergei Gorlatch, "Performance Portability and Unified Profiling for Finite Element Methods on Parallel Systems", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 119–127, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050116
61. Mariam Houti, Laila El Abbadi, Abdellah Abouabdellah, "CSFs for the Implementation of the Hybrid Lean ERP System. Stakeholders Interactions", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 443–447, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040655
62. Aref Hassan Kurd Ali, Halikul Lenando, Mohamad Alrfaay, Slim Chaoui, Haithem Ben Chikha, Akram Ajouli, "Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in Resource-Constrained Opportunistic Networks", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 402–413, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040651
63. Omar Freddy Chamorro Atalaya, Dora Yvonne Arce Santillan, Jorge Isaac Castro Bedriñana, Yesica Pamela Leandro Chacón, Martin Díaz Choque, "The Correlation of the Specific and Global Performance of Teachers in UNTELS Engineering Schools", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 196–202, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040625
64. Ramachandran Ravi Sowmiyasree, Nachimuthu Maheswari, Manickam Sivagami, "Improving the Performance of Hadoop Framework Using Optimization Process in the Information Management", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 327–333, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040542
65. Toshiyasu Kato, Yuki Terawaki, Yasushi Kodama, Teruhiko Unoki, Yasushi Kambayashi, "Estimating Academic results from Trainees’ Activities in Programming Exercises Using Four Types of Machine Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 321–326, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040541
66. Lajmi Imen, Masmoudi Wassim, Elleuch Mounir, Chtourou Hedi, "Improvement opportunities of a Simulation/Expert System Approach for Manufacturing System Sizing: A review and proposal", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 213–223, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040527
67. Rung-Shiang Cheng, Wei-Jun Hong, Jhe-Lin Li, Kawuu W. Lin, "Indoor Positioning and Path Planning Platform for iRobot Create 2 Sweeping Robot", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 198–206, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040327
68. Muhammad Usman Sheikh, Ritayan Biswas, Jukka Lempiainen, Riku Jantti, "Assessment of Coordinated Multipoint Transmission Modes for Indoor and Outdoor Users at 28 GHz in Urban Macrocellular Environment", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 119–126, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040216
69. Lev Lafayette, Bernd Wiebelt, Dirk von Suchdoletz, Helena Rasche, Michael Janczyk, Daniel Tosello, "The Chimera and the Cyborg", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040201
70. János Végh, József Vásárhelyi, Dániel Drótos, "Can parallelization save the (computing) world?", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 141–158, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040114
71. Waleed Al Shehri, Maher Khemakhem, Abdullah Basuhail, Fathy E. Eassa, "A Proposed Architecture for Parallel HPC-based Resource Management System for Big Data Applications", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040105
72. Yoshihiko Tagawa, Masayuki Omoto, Hiroo Matsuse, Naoto Shiba, "Simulation Strategy to Enhance Oxygen Uptake and Reaction Forces at Leg Joints and Vertebral Bodies During Ergometer Exercise Under Altered Gravity", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 8–20, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj030402
73. Moises Levy, Daniel Raviv, "An Overview of Data Center Metrics and a Novel Approach for a New Family of Metrics", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 238–251, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030228
74. Khaoula Mannay, Jesus Urena, Álvaro Hernández, Mohsen Machhout, "Performance of Location and Positioning Systems: a 3D-Ultrasonic System Case", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 106–118, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030213
75. Muhammad Usman Sheikh, Kimmo Hiltunen, Jukka Lempiainen, "Enhanced Outdoor to Indoor Propagation Models and Impact of Different Ray Tracing Approaches at Higher Frequencies", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030207
76. Zheng Li, Maria Kihl, Yiqun Chen, He Zhang, "Two-Stage Performance Engineering of Container-based Virtualization", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 521–536, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030163
77. Aneta George, Liam Peyton, Voicu Groza, "Systematic Tool Support of Engineering Education Performance Management", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 418–425, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030151
78. Muhammad Usman Sheikh, Jukka Lempiainen, "Analysis of Outdoor and Indoor Propagation at 15 GHz and Millimeter Wave Frequencies in Microcellular Environment", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 160–167, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030120
79. Ruijian Zhang, Deren Li, "Applying Machine Learning and High Performance Computing to Water Quality Assessment and Prediction", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 285–289, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020635
80. Habib Smei, Kamel Smiri, Abderrazak Jemai, "A New profiling and pipelining approach for HEVC Decoder on ZedBoard Platform", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 40–48, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020605
81. Moises Levy, Jason O. Hallstrom, "A Reliable, Non-Invasive Approach to Data Center Monitoring and Management", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1577–1584, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj0203196
82. Michael Fries, Markus Lienkamp, "Predictive Technology Management for the Identification of Future Development Trends and the Maximum Achievable Potential Based on a Quantitative Analysis", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1042–1049, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj0203132
83. Stefania Nanni, Elisa Benetti, Gianluca Mazzini, "Indoor monitoring in Public Buildings: workplace wellbeing and energy consumptions. An example of IoT for smart cities application", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 884–890, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj0203110
84. Furqan Jameel, Faisal, M Asif Ali Haider, Amir Aziz Butt, "Security in SWIPT with Power Splitting Eavesdropper", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 384–388, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020349
85. Mona A. Abou-Of, Amr A. Sedky, Ahmed H. Taha, "Power-Energy Simulation for Multi-Core Processors in Bench-marking", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 255–262, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020131
86. Michail Papoutsidakis, Georgios Chamilothoris, Dimitrios Tseles, "Robust µController Implementations for a Linear Pneumatic Actuator Interaction", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 6–10, 2016. doi: 10.25046/aj010202